"Other" football

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Celtic just been gifted a shot at the title again now North of the border.

Very iffy last second penalty awarded after VAR review which was only made after a Celtic player went down in the box theatrically when trying to claim he'd been elbowed.

Absolutely shocking decision making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clingo and BluefromBridgend
BrizzleBluebird said:
Celtic just been gifted a shot at the title again now North of the border.

Very iffy last second penalty awarded after VAR review which was only made after a Celtic player went down in the box theatrically when trying to claim he'd been elbowed.

Absolutely shocking decision making.
Click to expand...
As soon as a ref is told to go to the screen it’s odds on his on field decision is overturned. VAR is not fit for purpose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clingo, BluefromBridgend, BrizzleBluebird and 1 other person
remote said:
An intetesting issue for London tax payers if the Hammers get relegated.

www.bbc.co.uk

West Ham: London taxpayers could pay extra £2.5m if Hammers relegated

London taxpayers may have to pay an extra £2.5m if West Ham are relegated from the Premier League, because of the club's lease agreement for London Stadium.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
Click to expand...

Very likely to be the case. Spurs need 1 point from last 2 games to relegate the Spammers. Thankyou Newcastle.

However there is an adjective frequently used in North London - Spursie!!!

There should be a highly critical review of the very favourable lease arrangement granted to West Ham. Typical Boris crap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: irishbluebird and TwoWrights
Spygate outcome apparently due tomorrow. All options open to the EFL are still on the table according to local press.
 
BrizzleBluebird said:
Can't see them having the cahones to expel them and reinstate Boro. The legal challenges would be fierce from Southampton, especially as Leeds also got done for it a few years back and from memory only got a fine.
Click to expand...
When Leeds got done there was no specific offence. Now it's that you can spy on training sessions within 72 hours of a match, an odd rule. :emoticon-0138-think


The views expressed in this post are 67% recycled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrizzleBluebird and BluefromBridgend
BrizzleBluebird said:
Can't see them having the cahones to expel them and reinstate Boro. The legal challenges would be fierce from Southampton, especially as Leeds also got done for it a few years back and from memory only got a fine.
Click to expand...
Well that backfired... Hull are now in the play off final ....not very saintly by the FA? :angel::angel:

oops Hull v Boro of course <doh>
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
It would be no surprise if Southampton are in the High Court tomorrow morning seeking an injunction and for the final to be deferred pending an appeal on the grounds the punishment doesn’t fit the crime<whistle>
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
ninian opinion said:
It would be no surprise if Southampton are in the High Court tomorrow morning seeking an injunction and for the final to be deferred pending an appeal on the grounds the punishment doesn’t fit the crime<whistle>
Click to expand...
Makes a mockery of the whole thing.
B0ll0cks to teams 3 to 8 in the playoffs. 3 up, 3 down.

To be honest, whats wrong with watching training?
You can watch 46 games to see what they do.
Open training up to each other. Watch how each other attack. Watch how each other defend. If you can counter it, good on you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BluefromBridgend
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back