Yes. A real hero. I truly hope her faith and courage can change things for her people and deliver them from stoneage ignorance, and wicked manipulation of their love in their God. That said, this post is going to look ****ing weird when I change my avatar this afternoon to Bender (I change it every week).
Despite what this bloke thinks; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk&feature=player_embedded Things aren't always what they seem.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=aWfyiQBJvNI
Oranges are not really oranges. They're the knackers of the Giant ******ed Badger-Snail of Cygnus IX B. The Illuminati feed them to us to keep us docile. Thousands of experts have shown this to be true. But we don't care.
Yeah by indigenous tribes from South America or someone who's never heard of them. Who's never heard of an orange? whomever they are may think it is something else, but those of us who know what an orange is say "it's an orange" unrelated as those who think the B2 was an alien ship never knew about them the point made was this is an orange we know what it is. This is a demolished building we know what it is.
But the argument is not about what the demolished building is, but how it came to be demolished. The orange analogy in the video is an absurd non sequitur. The age old, and thoroughly transparent, debating device of stating an obvious, verifiable truth and attempting to use it to support an unlinked conclusion.
This is interesting, also explains the weird flashes you see before the plane actually hits. There were no planes, sounds insane but if you actually watch it through it actually doesn't seem so insane, also explains why some onlookers say they thought "it was a missile or something" This guy has offered 100k for a high quality copy of the crashes. Also included several onlookers say there was no plane just an explosion, of course we were never shown those but they were part of reporting on the day. Seriously, this is worth a watch, not some nut. I never thought there would be no planes and this is the masterstroke of the whole plan, everyone is arguing about the planes and they possibly never existed. [video=youtube;04LCvk2KYfY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=04LCvk2KYfY[/video] Eye witness accounts that aren't on Fox and NBC DVDs and reporting. How can people miss the planes flying into the building. The Destruction [video=youtube;YN4GvwJrC_w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN4GvwJrC_w[/video] Interested in what you have to say Donga if you have time to watch both videos that is.
Anyone who believes it was a plane attack must watch the 2nd video. The Destruction. here it is again, they used nukes underground on all 3 buildings. **** ME. This is why the buildings free fell. [video=youtube;YN4GvwJrC_w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=YN4GvwJrC_w[/video] It will change your mind.
Not got time to watch the videos atm, and I'm far from a believer of the official story, but nukes under the buildings is stretching it somewhat...
You have not watched either video and are dismissing it already, it is explained technically and not Alex jones style, Jones is actually working for the media, make no mistake. it explains why not even a mouse was found intact. Temps of 1500 degrees 6 weeks after the collapse!! and why all 3 buildings actually turned to dust. When you get time watch both if you are bothered, it's shocking. It's right though when people think of Nuke explosion they think mushroom cloud, it was nuke demolition, it pulverised all 3 buildings up to a certain height and the tops just fell down except wtc 7 was pulverised completely
Full Dimitri Khalesov piece. Ex USSR military nuclear testing division. Small note for the non believers To penetrate metal like in the columns of the WTC which were essentially each as thick as a tanks armour requires speeds of mac 3-4 and a projectile made of a harder material like tungsten or depleted uranium so to experts around the world mock the idea that a hollow aluminum plane at sub sonic speed could penetrate 8 columns of metal. Not consider it unlikely, but laugh at it. Anyone understand physics on here? People think the speed of the plane had an effect, the plane supposedly traveling at 500mph strikes the static building, which contained more force the plane or the building? They had equal force. The plane should have crumpled and most of it should have fell down the side of the building, it was designed to take a strike from a post world war II bomber. No one likes to address the inconvenient fact that several hijackers were alive after 9\11. No media likes to report the evidence, that the second building just exploded, no plane which had been mentioned several times by different people on that day and afterwards. I had thought I had some ideas but questioned them and I was wrong and I was never certain, until now. There were no planes. Why would I care, this changed the entire world as we know it and millions are dead because of it. It's 4 hours so I expect very few if any to watch this, for only those that are interested. Dimitri Khalesov lives in danger constantly over his book The Third truth and no one would publish it, weird that aint it. His site has archives that can be downloaded and the passwords will be provided in the event of his untimely death. he released his book for free. His colleague was killed in Bangkok, the very guy who did the research on the granite missile that hit the pentagon, again no plane. His book covers all the aspects of the whole fake attack on the US. http://www.911thology.com/ [video=youtube;Lec9giab90I]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Lec9giab90I[/video]
This is something I never knew, maybe donga can explain this away. Here is a picture of a woman, it's not fake nor officially called a fake even, she is standing in an area supposedly so hot as to melt the steel of the building, how could she survive never mind stand such heat. please log in to view this image please log in to view this image The nose of the plane came out as we seen in the fake videos please log in to view this image hmm, no exit hole on the building that supposedly just had a plane crash through it. The video shot that was manufactured from that angle was messed up hence the 12 frames of black footage to cover this video editing mistake right after the fake impact. never mind that the supposed 2nd plane has two different approach angles from two different camera angles, one shows horizontal the other an angled dive bomber descent
So I watched this one in a bit of spare time and I don't buy it. I get what they're saying, but it's not proof, it's not evidence. There's not thousands of people saying that - it's one guy, and a few frames of tape and one guys theory of plane collisions isn't enough to get people probing the events of that day. I don't believe the official story, but there are better lines of questioning and interrogation to be followed rather than claims of nuclear explosions below the towers or ghost planes.
Will it satisfy you if I say that Scooby Doo sat on them and squashed them flat? This is just nonesense and I'm not wasting any more time on it. These people either have a major conspiracy illness or are just making themselves look interesting (their 5 minutes of fame)!
