If you want more coincidences, you could ask why the security on the WTC buildings were lowered in the days before the attack, why were sniffer dogs removed days before the attack despite the WTC having been on high bomb threat alert the previous week, why the company which were 'replacing' the new security system were owned by the brother of Bush, his brother's security company also lead the security at Dulles airport from which the planes were taken, why was a new insurance policy added for the WTC buildings weeks before the attack incase of terrorist attack, why was a huge amount of put options placed on United Airlines starting on the 9/6/13 at 2.5 times higher than average which kept increasing over the next 2 days to an incredible 280 times higher than average - the company was also owned by the number 3 of the CIA at the time, the defense company was holding a conference in D.C on 9/11 with special guest, Bin Laden's brother, the pilot's baggage containing incriminating evidence later found at the airport was the only bag of all 80+ passengers which wasn't loaded onto the connecting flight, 5 of the hijackers stayed in a hotel yards across the road from NSA's headquarters, the Pentagon had all their emergency medial kits out ready in their locations for an inventory check (based on a new disaster plan in the unlikely event of a plan hitting the building released that morning of the attack) which their medics were reading as the plane hit, Silverstein (the man who owns and took out the new multi billion insurance policy on the WTC) was out in a doctors appointment on the day of the attack and his two children (employees) were 'running late', two clocks in the Pentagon blast, when recovered, both had their time stopped at 9:32 - except the plane hit the Pentagon at 9:38, a large building called 911 for a big fire response 1 minute before the Pentagon hit but when the emergency response team got there there was no fire thus all the units could go to the nearby Pentagon - lucky that! - the only part of the Pentagon hit was the one part which was reinforced against a terrorist attack and also held all the accounts info (including that of the 2.3trillion defense missing money which was subsequently written off)... I could go on and on. There are literally hundreds of coincidences like this - and I'm not talking about the lame **** like 'oh look, if you fold a 1 dollar bill it makes a burning image of the WTC. Proper coincidences like the above. I'm not one to run around crying conspiracy, I'm just pointing out that there are a hell of a lot of coincidences which paved the way to this event happening and no one seems able to answer them. One or two strange things lining up are coincidences, this many means serious questions need asking.
I agree with a lot of those questions mate but they are just that and a distraction from the proof. Lots of "?" Look at this and tell me WTC 7 was not dropped. [video=youtube;Zv7BImVvEyk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk[/video] I am 100% convinced that this was not an Al Qaeda attack on the US, no doubts whatsoever Maybe if Fox news reports it was not terrorists or the BBC then Donga will see the light
I'm naturally cautious. In many ways I agree with you, but I'm also quite prepared to accept that there are many ways of looking at things and explanations can be found for why buildings might drop the way they do. I'm no expert and experts seem to differ in opinion on it. Therefore I avoid those things and sit on the fence. The way I approach it is from the questioning side because there are too many coincidences for my liking and that warrants an investigation bigger than the Monica Lewinsky affair investigation and hopefully involving more money too but this time without Bush and Chaney having a secret, unrecorded, undocumented and non-oath enforced chance to talk. Just too many damn questions.
MIT engineer, this guy must know what the fcuk he is talking about, MIT engineer Donga [video=youtube;z8W-t57xnZg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8W-t57xnZg[/video] No proper modeled explanation EVER given as to how the WTC buildings collapsed, and that are the ones hit by the planes. never mind WTC7 My source is better than yours. A terrible pilot hits pentagon accounting office holding records of missing 3 trillion in oil for money scheme & missing 2.3 trillion in DOD expenses Pentagon debris a single 3 foot engine Proven not related to 757 FBI took all recordings & refuses to show The FCC had all records on criminals like Paulson, Geithner, Ruben, Summers & others engaging in that illegal activity. But all the records of those illegal trades were destroyed when WTC 7 911 was a public snuff film used to shock the public and enact the end of the Bill of Rights & invasion of oil bearing countries, & make money for private companies like Halliburton By destroying the WTC, they were able to cover up theft of gold bullion & destroy illegal financial transaction records performed just prior to the attacks Silverstein spends 140 million to make 7 billion almost over night; Silverstein said it was demolished by explosives, (pull it) Ex General of military intelligence. [video=youtube;daNr_TrBw6E]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=daNr_TrBw6E[/video]
yet MORE engineers dispute this. There is a perfectly logical explanation why it pancaked, just as there were in WWII when some buildings in the immediate vicinity of a collapsing tower block fall and others don't. And WTC 1&2? Oh come on, you HAVEN'T read the link, about melting girders and so forth, have you? Sis, I read and watched your stuff; do you even bother? Really?
You defy logic brotha. Added General of military intelligence speaking on it to my last post, yet another highly qualified conspiracy theorist it seems according to you
Seems churlish to ask why Al Qaeda eventually claimed responsibility for it then.... As for Fox News and stuff - ok, that's enough. Just because I disagree with you I now get labelled as some comatose right wing Mail-fodder. Grow up, eh? I appreciate you're a lot closer in years in years to the fifth form debating society than I am, but if you can't contend with the fact that I hold a different opinion than you after reading and seeing the same evidence there's no need to act like a left version of Paul Dacre. If you have a critique of the link I've posted I'll respond. If not, I'm out of here.
Do you want me to list all the qualifications of the overwhelming majority of experts, engineers and scientists who disagree/ is this a my dad's bigger than your dad argument?
Compartmentalization lad. Strategic division of information and labour. in banks government military and corporate you have world wide millions of people who are doing their jobs. They have no idea of what the chief aims are of those on top, they know what they are told and are certain they are just doing their jobs. It is not the "Government" that is responsible for 9\11. It is those who actually run the country. Do you think Obama is commander in chief? If so, where did he get the money for his presidential campaign? Most of it came from the likes of Monsanto and the banks. Not individual donations by the million. Do you think he was just given all that money on good faith? or was he bought. Is it a coincidence that he took many from the corporate world and put them in control of government departments and operations? Do you think he actually selects who runs the federal reserve? What do you think would happen if he went rogue and actually did what was best for the public, that's right, no campaign funds, no support. No presidency. You really think politicians run countries Far far too many convenient coincidences that suited those behind the scenes. It makes absolutely no sense for Bin laden to orchestrate that attack. It never made sense. Especially when he's worked for the US for decades.
Not sure what I think of Galloway - see a lot of him online and agree with most, but not all of what he says. He almost tries too hard to find a 'hidden truth' in everything. But he nevertheless performs a vital role in our political spectrum - he is actually willing to speak out and be his own figurehead. Never agreed with Blair after his dissolution of the Jedi order.
Right lads, it's Monday so back to reality. Conspiracy and fantasy should be tucked back into their box with the rest of the toys. Boring I know but we must at least try and be grown-ups again.
If you dont like it dont read the thread It's not doasdavesays.com Maybe Obama could use you in his administration
Maybe you should accept that by merely regurgitating a string of others peoples thoughts (true or false) you are not really progressing any further understanding. However, you will/have provoked a contrary reaction which you have made no attempt to reconcile with and therefore not progressed the discussion any. Merely adding more opinion (they are not truly facts) is not going to win your case but it will throw up higher barricades. So if you want, you stay behind your barricade and keep shouting and keep shouting. It won't convince a single person who does not agree with you to change sides. However, it will make more and more people bored with the whole 'debate'. BTW, my earlier comment was supposed to be mildly humorous!
"I could have throttled him for his self-publicity seeking opportunism over the evra affair when he opined that Luis should be deported." He can go **** himself then.
okay Dave, you're right. I'm getting nowhere, and neither is Sis. Just can't see anything that answers the question WHY? WHY would anyone want to bring down WTC7, if it was a conspiracy to bring down 1 and 2? Surely if you've brought down 1 and 2 it's job done? Just completely illogical.
