OT - 10 years of Roman

To be able to google you need to have the intelligence to know what to search for so I can quite understand why you don't.

Pretty obvious you're a bit thick when you don't even know what the simple word 'history' means

 

Does it not bother you that everyone hates the manc **** and their glory hunting plastic "fans".

 

No, it clearly had many more depths to plunge.

Like a bunch of five year olds squabbling over some Lego.

Sad beyond belief.

 

History with in footballing means success, that's why Liverpool live on there past, Chavski FC have no past, so have little "history" worth reading about.

 

No, success means success and it's pathetic to try and change the meaning of the English language just because it makes you look foolish....although in your case foolish is something you are used too.

 

idiot ... when we are discussing who is having the best history, we are not talking about boring changes or happenings which is without any significance or importance .. anything to be qualified as an event it should be with some significant importance to put a mark chronologically , this is why if someone want to write about Chelsea's history prior to Abra, then one page should be more than enough ... while clubs like UTD or Liverpool can write books

 

Chavski and history don't go hand in hand, until 10 years ago, so that makes you the fool, fool

 

We supposedly been in decide since 99, and we have still consistently been the best team in the country haha

 

mods close this please and have CpofL removed from this board seeing as he's clogging up every thread..

Over 12's only from now on

 

Ha. Obsessed with history that means nothing. You poor scouser.

 

..

 

I can see why you'd want that as I make you look a complete tool everyday. I get pms from your fellow fans thanking me.

 

hhhh you know they must be laughing on you trying to make you keep acting like a fool here, sure you know that? don't tell me you bought what they told you?

 

I'm sorry Shwan my bad but his stupidity amuses me and therefore must be encouraged. Though he has been a little desperate of late I must admit.

 

am confused ...you are refering to CPofL KTBFFH? right?

 

Yes Shwan I am.

 

true

 

After 10 years of RA ownership, they are still second to UTD

http://www.statto.com/football/stats/england/premier-league/all-time-table/10-year

 

not to forget spending 1 Billion too in the process
the club is now worth £570m, despite an estimated 1 Billion injection .. this club is like a black hole

 

this thread was only ever going to go one way guys.
love the whole history argument.
Opposition fans will never convince me of the whole "you have no history" bullshit.
I went to dozens of games pre RA snd saw us win trophies Pre RA and loved every minute of it. Its kind of pathetic to even make such statements, especially since, as someone has pointed out, Chelsea are still behind Man Utd in recent years in the trophy stakes.
What exactly has riled you so?
Liverpool fans I can understand because most are ******ed and their club is nowhere near title contention and arent going to be any time soon, so they are bitter.
But Man Utd fans...your club is still winning, so whats your problem? The money thing?
Man Utd "earnt" their money by rigging the game through Sky ( by rig the game, I dont mean the results, I mean the financial and advertising aspect), and also by being one of the first clubs to exploit the Far East, in terms of sweatshops and the, lets say, less than clued up glory hunting plastic fans over there.
I dont see all that much difference, except Chelsea got fast tracked through Roman.
The money rules ship sailed in 1992 when the PL was formed guys I am afraid