Fez, yet again you do read into a post what you like.
Examples:
Where did I say that the OSC could not take part or support campaigns that affect the sport?
Show me one single post where I supported the name change to Hull Tigers. I have never "sat on the fence" as far as losing "City" from the playing name.
The OSC only represents it membership it can only be representative of its members and so it has limited representation. Trust and protest groups can canvas opinion from the wider supporter base and take part or support campaigns that affect the sport. There is a widely accepted difference in the roles of supporters clubs and supporters trusts.
As for social intent, I am surprised that you are not aware of the sub group that HCST formed in order to improve the match day atmosphere at the KC or the social events that it puts on. I am surprised that no one has listened when you have stated that there should be no contact with the club, yet HCST board members attend not only the FWG but SAG as well.
TOM, if you are trying to wriggle out of what you have clearly said, then good for you, but we can all read what we see and if you meant something different then you should explain it clearly.
You still don't seem to understand what sitting on the fence is, do you. Many of us have remarked on it, you can be as evasive as you wish, but it's a bit late now to be in denial of being on the fence. (I'll give you a clue; you said that you would rather it stay the same, but you also said you could understand why he wanted it and that it would not change your support of Allam, the club, or his business plans. I really can't be arsed to trawl back as we all saw it and remarked on it. You have a selective memory.
You never answer anything, you simply keep muddying the waters. I have read what you write; the problem is you keep changing your position. Kempton summed it up very well.