It's a little tiresome hearing managers struggle against Swansea and turn against the ref. When they roll out the old 'consistency' criticism it shows how desperate they are (it's a clear acknowledgement that they can find no fault int he actual decisions).
Some times they just need to admit that they were lucky not to have gotten a hiding - six wouldn't have been unrealistic.
Some things to point out for Coyle: it was Gardner's third foul, not first (watch the video - ref signals that it was third offence - Gardner had already escaped taking out one of our players earlier - really should have got a yellow for that, if anything), Britton was booked for that challenge (not later on), Coyle commented that one of our players tugged a player back earlier (he should consider context really - Dyer was in the process of skinning Gardner, the one he comments on saw a number of Swans defenders around the Bolton player), and this 'agenda' against Bolton - why? When has anyone ever seen a clear bias against them? Does he really think the league has a determination for the Swnas to stay up over anyone else? It's desperate and irresponsible - so easy to vaguely hint (it has to stay vague because there's no substance to it) but he should be responsible enough to realise that he is making a very serious allegation of corruption. Something that would become a police matter and could destroy a career. Some managers need to think before they open their mouths.
Some times they just need to admit that they were lucky not to have gotten a hiding - six wouldn't have been unrealistic.
Some things to point out for Coyle: it was Gardner's third foul, not first (watch the video - ref signals that it was third offence - Gardner had already escaped taking out one of our players earlier - really should have got a yellow for that, if anything), Britton was booked for that challenge (not later on), Coyle commented that one of our players tugged a player back earlier (he should consider context really - Dyer was in the process of skinning Gardner, the one he comments on saw a number of Swans defenders around the Bolton player), and this 'agenda' against Bolton - why? When has anyone ever seen a clear bias against them? Does he really think the league has a determination for the Swnas to stay up over anyone else? It's desperate and irresponsible - so easy to vaguely hint (it has to stay vague because there's no substance to it) but he should be responsible enough to realise that he is making a very serious allegation of corruption. Something that would become a police matter and could destroy a career. Some managers need to think before they open their mouths.
To think he could have still have been our manager if things turned out different ..