Off Topic OLOF's political thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Tommy Robinson found guilty on stitched up charges, by corrupt Judges appointed by a corrupt Attorney General under instruction from a corrupt Government.

Even the Judges broke the law to convict TR.................such is how part of our Justice system has become corrupt.

I hope he does appeal the decision and show the corrupt left we don't lay down and die without a fight.

You must log in or register to see media

Crowd not very happy with the coppers........A pub about 50 yards away also refused to sell 2 war veterans a pint cos they were there to support TR......One had his medals on and everything.............such is the war in Britain, and around the world, it'll only get bigger and worse.

Frustrations are growing, tethers are being stretched.

You must log in or register to see media

And of course, the BBC tell their lies, do their cover ups and omit truthful details.

Ironic that TR was in court on so called crimes that the Journalists there were committing against TR.

You must log in or register to see media
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ringo Lion
LeedsLover said:
Tommy Robinson found guilty on stitched up charges, by corrupt Judges appointed by a corrupt Attorney General under instruction from a corrupt Government.

Even the Judges broke the law to convict TR.................such is how part of our Justice system has become corrupt.

I hope he does appeal the decision and show the corrupt left we don't lay down and die without a fight.

You must log in or register to see media

Crowd not very happy with the coppers........A pub about 50 yards away also refused to sell 2 war veterans a pint cos they were there to support TR......One had his medals on and everything.............such is the war in Britain, and around the world, it'll only get bigger and worse.

Frustrations are growing, tethers are being stretched.

You must log in or register to see media

And of course, the BBC tell their lies, do their cover ups and omit truthful details.

Ironic that TR was in court on so called crimes that the Journalists there were committing against TR.

You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...
You don't see what he did was wrong.

The grooming gang went to prison and that's where they should be but in doing what he did he risked the prosecution and conviction of this and other gangs.

The law is there for everybody and just because he wants to he can't flaunt a court order preventing reporting, which was properly in place to enable a fair trial taking place, yes everybody even low life scum are entitled to a fair trial.

It was possible that given what he did these then defendants could have got off on a "technicality"

I don't understand why he is doing what he is doing now but it really looks like a publicity stunt. I suspect he will be given a short sentence and considering time served will probably be put on probation and walk from court. It then will depend what he wants to do to further his public profile.

There can however be no justification for taunting and harassing the police outside the court as if it was their fault that the Judge found that Robinson was in contempt of court.

As for the BBC video this reporting wasn't about the grooming gangs it was about Robinsons contempt trial and they were referred to as defendants as the reporter was relaying the issue around the live streaming that Robinson did i.e. when they had not been convicted and hence the risk to their conviction this presented.

If you look hard enough you can see bogey men in every corner the trick is identifying the real ones. The grooming gangs are evil but what Robinson is doing isn't helping anybody address that menace. Maybe it is making Mrs Smith of 34 Privet Close aware that these things exist but stopping them?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Whitejock
I stumbled upon this article last night. I follow an anti-establishment guy on Youtube & only just discovered he has a website. I read this one on Mr Yaxley-Lennon & found it very interesting. It should be of interest to anyone, whether pro- or against- Yaxley-Lennon. See what you think. It appears Yaxley-Lennon doesn't know as much about he law as he thinks he does.

Just to be clear, I believe this to be an absolutely unbiased write-up, given that they both spend their lives railing against the establishment. Only one knows the law, though & his vids are really quite entertaining. And he successfully sues the police. Often. :)

https://crimebodge.com/tommy-robinsons-failed-lawsuit-ignorance-arrogance-and-fakery/

For me, his youtube site is far more interesting:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUSL8poMxM_uXWzWExJaY-w/videos
 
Eric Le Merde said:
You don't see what he did was wrong.

The grooming gang went to prison and that's where they should be but in doing what he did he risked the prosecution and conviction of this and other gangs.

The law is there for everybody and just because he wants to he can't flaunt a court order preventing reporting, which was properly in place to enable a fair trial taking place, yes everybody even low life scum are entitled to a fair trial.

It was possible that given what he did these then defendants could have got off on a "technicality"

I don't understand why he is doing what he is doing now but it really looks like a publicity stunt. I suspect he will be given a short sentence and considering time served will probably be put on probation and walk from court. It then will depend what he wants to do to further his public profile.

There can however be no justification for taunting and harassing the police outside the court as if it was their fault that the Judge found that Robinson was in contempt of court.

As for the BBC video this reporting wasn't about the grooming gangs it was about Robinsons contempt trial and they were referred to as defendants as the reporter was relaying the issue around the live streaming that Robinson did i.e. when they had not been convicted and hence the risk to their conviction this presented.

If you look hard enough you can see bogey men in every corner the trick is identifying the real ones. The grooming gangs are evil but what Robinson is doing isn't helping anybody address that menace. Maybe it is making Mrs Smith of 34 Privet Close aware that these things exist but stopping them?
Click to expand...
Is it any more wrong than a Muslim MP saying the kids raped by Muslims should shut up for the sake of diversity. Tommy is bringing it to the forefront because others are covering it up.
She should be sacked and thrown in prison for race hate, but I notice not a one of the snowflakes have said a word about her, and that's the reason Tommy has to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alf Hooker
lifecheshirewhite said:
Is it any more wrong than a Muslim MP saying the kids raped by Muslims should shut up for the sake of diversity. Tommy is bringing it to the forefront because others are covering it up.
She should be sacked and thrown in prison for race hate, but I notice not a one of the snowflakes have said a word about her, and that's the reason Tommy has to.
Click to expand...
LOL. Either that or everyone ignored her for being a silly bitch.

I'll tell you who noticed what was going on:

1. The police for investigating & catching the barstewards.
2. The CPS for putting a watertight case to court.
3. The jury for coming up with the guilty verdicts.
4. The judges for handing out appropriate sentencing.

Now I'll tell you who thought he knew what was going on - Mr Yaxley-Lennon. And with these horribly wrong thoughts, he chose to jeopardise the good work put in by those in the list above. If he had not been stopped by the police, those barstewards would almost certainly have got off on a technicality. And been free men. Which they are not presently. Now for someone who advocates that he knows so much about the law, were Mr Yaxley-Lennon's actions sheer stupidity, or did he realise what was going on & was trying to get them off on said technicalities? It's always someone else's fault with Mr Yaxley-Lennon, isn't it, so I can imagine his campaign if he had managed to get them released. Not his fault, of course!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Eric Le Merde
Eric Le Merde said:
You don't see what he did was wrong.

The grooming gang went to prison and that's where they should be but in doing what he did he risked the prosecution and conviction of this and other gangs.

The law is there for everybody and just because he wants to he can't flaunt a court order preventing reporting, which was properly in place to enable a fair trial taking place, yes everybody even low life scum are entitled to a fair trial.

It was possible that given what he did these then defendants could have got off on a "technicality"

I don't understand why he is doing what he is doing now but it really looks like a publicity stunt. I suspect he will be given a short sentence and considering time served will probably be put on probation and walk from court. It then will depend what he wants to do to further his public profile.

There can however be no justification for taunting and harassing the police outside the court as if it was their fault that the Judge found that Robinson was in contempt of court.

As for the BBC video this reporting wasn't about the grooming gangs it was about Robinsons contempt trial and they were referred to as defendants as the reporter was relaying the issue around the live streaming that Robinson did i.e. when they had not been convicted and hence the risk to their conviction this presented.

If you look hard enough you can see bogey men in every corner the trick is identifying the real ones. The grooming gangs are evil but what Robinson is doing isn't helping anybody address that menace. Maybe it is making Mrs Smith of 34 Privet Close aware that these things exist but stopping them?
Click to expand...

You don't do research do you.

Trial was over, they were found guilty. They attended court for their sentencing.

TR only mentioned what was already mentioned by the BBC and it was public information.

The court clerk admitted they didn't put up the info regarding no reporting by media.

The Prosecutor said TR molested those poor muslim rapists and caused them anxiety.

It was a stitch up and a joke, even the Judges broke the law.

Try the shortened version.

You must log in or register to see media
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Alf Hooker
Whitejock said:
LOL. Either that or everyone ignored her for being a silly bitch.

I'll tell you who noticed what was going on:

1. The police for investigating & catching the barstewards.
2. The CPS for putting a watertight case to court.
3. The jury for coming up with the guilty verdicts.
4. The judges for handing out appropriate sentencing.

Now I'll tell you who thought he knew what was going on - Mr Yaxley-Lennon. And with these horribly wrong thoughts, he chose to jeopardise the good work put in by those in the list above. If he had not been stopped by the police, those barstewards would almost certainly have got off on a technicality. And been free men. Which they are not presently. Now for someone who advocates that he knows so much about the law, were Mr Yaxley-Lennon's actions sheer stupidity, or did he realise what was going on & was trying to get them off on said technicalities? It's always someone else's fault with Mr Yaxley-Lennon, isn't it, so I can imagine his campaign if he had managed to get them reliease. Not his fault, of course!
Click to expand...
Well if they get off on technicalities, they could have a second trial like the White people do. <whistle>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whitejock
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back