Oh dear!!!

In your thread - Oh dear , you stated that Fernandez head butted Richards (Post no. 7) Now you are saying it was minimal contact.Make YOUR mind up. Perhaps you have changed your mind after the FA's descision not to take further action after the recommendation of 3 top ex referees.
PS am waiting for your outburst like the last time I disagreed with you when you told me to SHUT UP!

 

He probably asked "who's your barber"

 

He wouldn't have been sent off because the officials didn't see ? ,. the crowd made enough noise to alert the officials the linesman then contacted the ref who then had to run from the centre circle to sort things out .

 

What about the £5m fine for our club? Or the most red cards last season? I'm stunned at the level of bullshit that you have posted for 'obvious reasons'

 

interesting read

 

Isn't it just!............

 

Fool. I'm "stunned" at your level of stupidity.

 

"On another day,with another ref,he could have been sent off".

Which part of that didn't you understand?

 

A head butt is just that,a head butt, and minimal contact would suffice to qualify. Now,where exactly have I changed my mind?

A bit selective with your quote,but perhaps It would be better all round if you did "shut up".

 

"Oh dear".

0-3.

Don't those nasty Arsenal players realise just how "antagonistic" that scoreline is?

Come back Michael,before it's too late.

 

Any further comment by me would only "antagonise" you further.

I bet you are really "antagonised" by the score against Arsenal. But it's only "bullshit",eh?

 

Perhaps I should become an Agony Ant.

 

Vetch, you are embarrassing yourself again. You seem to have great difficulty conversing with those whose opinions differ to yours and it seems your sole agenda lately is to purposefully cause trouble and ridicule posts which do not support your views which is strange as you were an advocate of free speech under your previous Vetchetarian username.
There are various debates ongoing in the current threads, join in, you might enjoy it.

 

Me " embarrass" myself? No. It's YOU,that are embarrassing,with your blatant bias. I have opinions which you don't like,
You don't criticise others when they post insults and abuse. Why not?

I have no problem with free speech,but where is the free speech when I am accused of "antagonising" behaviour,by merely reproducing words written in the media? The word "bullshit" was hurled in my direction,also for reproducing the media opinion.
Where the **** were you then?
The free speech you,and some others crave,is merely toeing the party line. We have had this exchange so many times,it's very boring.

"Debate" is, and I quote my dictionary here - "a discussion,in which OPPOSING ARGUMENTS are put forward".( My capitals ).

So,what does "bullshit" and "antagonism" have to do with debate?

As I have stated previously,you,and your ilk, do not want debate,it's acquiescence,and one eyed partisanship you seek.

So,please cut out the sanctimony. It doesn't look good on you.

 

I bow to your superior intelligence!

 

once again interesting and I make no further comment

 

superior intelligence? .............

 

What did you think of the Swans formation after Montero was subbed yesterday?