Official Pre-season testing thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Trackside verdict: Mercedes rises early]

The first four days of a pre-season test schedule dominated by the biggest rule changes in recent history is no time to bet the house on any team or driver. But as a percentage play, it would be hard to overlook Mercedes.
Watching trackside at Jerez, at a sodden Turns 1 and 2, the W05 comes to the fore. The car's margin over the rest of the field is incredibly fine but, in its benign attitude through treacherous conditions, its balance and relative lack of understeer, it does just about exist.
Of course, in truth four days is a derisory period over which to form a fully-informed picture of the 2014 formbook.
The most obvious caveat is that we are yet to see anything even remotely meaningful from Red Bull, which has something of a pedigree when it comes to racking up grand prix victories and Formula 1 world championships.
The reality is that the usual adage - testing times are at worst meaningless, at best vague - is even more pertinent than usual.
This year's sweeping rule changes have created a fascinating duality to the formative stages of the season, in that running quickly has been pushed onto the periphery by simply running at all.
Teams are unlikely to be running their new V6 turbos to maximum RPM, and the rumoured limits of each manufacturer vary. This will have a massive impact upon what we're seeing.
On top of that, consider that engine mapping could vary wildly – again pronounced given the fact that torque comes not only from the turbo but from the ERS, capable of offering an additional 160bhp – and it would be a fool's errand to try to extrapolate anything meaningful or concrete from the prism of the first four days.
But that isn't to say that watching trackside doesn't have its merits, particularly when there's a chance to watch the cars in the dry, in the wet, and in the corridor of uncertainty in between.
The Mercedes, for example, looks a lazy car. Watching in the dry, at the final chicane, it lacks the bite of a Williams or a McLaren.
That laziness manifests itself in understeer into the chicane, and a less lively transition through it and onto the run down to the final hairpin.
But that isn't necessarily a bad thing. For starters, the team's relative strength last year was one-lap pace; its weakness race distances. A lazy car should theoretically put less strain on the rear tyres, which is why understeer is preferable to oversteer – albeit with the danger that, like last year's McLaren, the car becomes difficult to switch on.
In the wet, though, such laziness is manifested as stability. Nico Rosberg sometimes runs too deep and misses the Turn 1 apex, but on exit he rarely has to fight the rear.
The same is true at Turn 2, where the downhill slope exacerbates any underlying traits of oversteer. In tricky conditions, the Mercedes is massively assured and rarely breaks out of line. And when it does, it's easily controlled.
A counter-example is the Williams. At the chicane, and in the dry, it has an incredibly positive front end, with the car almost rotating about the front axle.
This doesn't appear to come at the expense of rear traction, and Felipe Massa isn't having to deal with oversteer as he flicks through the right-left-right sequence.
Transpose that into the wet, however, and the oversteer is more apparent, with Massa having to noticeably work to stop the rear end breaking through Turn 1.
That matters because, while the Brazilian is still quick – and not every race will be wet – it suggests that the Williams is working its rears more than the Merc, which could hurt it over long runs.
McLaren, meanwhile, is somewhere in the middle in terms of handling.
It too looks very sharp at the front end in the dry, but doesn't lose the rear as much as the Williams seems to in the wet.
It also changes direction well in both conditions, and clearly gives confidence to the drivers if Kevin Magnussen is anything to go by.
The Dane was hustling the car through the first turns beautifully, with the McLaren nicely poised on the limit of its – and the circuit's – traction.
Last year's inherent understeer certainly seems to have disappeared, and the car is a very, very close match for the Mercedes.
Judging Ferrari's F14 T is a bit more difficult.
The car appears nimble enough, although in the dry it sometimes looks to be giving up rear traction to its rivals.
In the wet it flicks between looking solid and very rear-happy, a picture complicated by the fact that Fernando Alonso stayed on wets as other changed to intermediates.
The Spaniard certainly got loose through Turn 2 on a few occasions, the rear braking more severely than the McLaren or Williams, but oversteer is both his wont and a possible exploration of the car's behaviour.
One area where the Ferrari does seem to excel is under braking, with the change down through the gears audibly more seamless than any other car, which AUTOSPORT technical guru Gary Anderson suggests could derive from playing with a zero torque loss downshift.
Of the others, the Sauber is a surprising handful in the wet, with Adrian Sutil struggling with both understeer and oversteer through Turns 1 and 2.
It's therefore incredibly snappy, with Sutil drifting wider and having to get on the power later than, say, the Mercedes and McLaren drivers.
It has also struggled badly under braking, which Sutil said on Wednesday derived from a problem with the new braking-by-wire system.
​"That system didn't work for us," he explained on Thursday. "That is why you probably saw me locking into every corner today. It's a system which should be a bit easier for the driver but more complicated for the engineer."
The Force India looked a more amenable beast, although it was only out for a handful of laps when we were trackside.
On that small sample set, it still looked sharper on turn-in than the Sauber. And, while it did suffer oversteer in the wet, it wasn't anything like as bad.
The Toro Rosso likewise headed out for just a handful of laps, but looked quite nimble and poised.
Rookie Daniil Kvyat had bags of confidence and was happy whenever the car broke traction – underlined by his ability to make it do so lap after lap – but in truth it won't be until the next test in Bahrain that we get a proper picture of its inherent qualities.
The same is true for Red Bull, Marussia and to an extent Caterham, which – perhaps unsurprisingly – looked difficult during the wet final morning.
In particular Kamui Kobayashi was struggling to find the apex of Turn 1, but where running wide worked for the Mercedes, he then had to wrestle the car to get the rear in line for the short run down to Turn 2.
Going trackside also yielded a few other general observations. The longer gearing of this year's engines, added to the additional torque available, means watching cars at hairpins initially feels alien as the expected final downshift never comes.
There's also an audible difference in acceleration, which doesn't always relate to speed.
Ferrari, for example, seemed to be using more torque from the ERS to exit Turn 1, which meant that it accelerated normally, but with a much flatter engine note than the Mercedes.
The Merc looked most composed throughout the four days, which, coupled with an emphatic lap count, is pretty ominous for the rest, even though McLaren in particular looks in the game.
But as is underlined every year, initial appearances can be deceiving, and this year there are even more parameters to add to the usual caveats of running programmes, fuel loads, tyres, temperatures and track conditions.
There is the huge unknown of Red Bull and its RB10. Fragile it may be for now, but quick? Don't bet against it.
Mercedes might have had the best of Jerez, but F1 2014 still has plenty of questions to answer.
Click to expand...

.
 
51LV3R8RR04 said:
Good point, but Infiniti seem pretty deep in with Red Bull and being Nissan and all I don't think Honda will be an option.
Click to expand...

This. They're tied in pretty tightly together. And I think long term Red Bull would rather be Renault's works team than McLaren's bitch as Honda customers.
 
Rob White, deputy managing director of Renault sport:


“We now know that the differences between dyno and car are bigger than we expected, with the consequence that our initial impressions were incomplete and imperfect.
“Our intention was to run the car; we are very frustrated to face this litany of issues that we should have ironed out on the dyno and which have deprived us of a precious learning opportunity.”
“We have not run enough laps, and when we have they have not been run at an acceptable performance level,”
“The underlying causes are not straightforward,” White explained. “There isn’t a single component or system that has caused particular trouble.”
“A number of related things have been troublesome, principally concerning the control and operation of the various sub-systems of the power unit within the car.
“For example on the first run day, we had problems with a sub-system within the energy store that did not directly concern either the battery nor the operation of the battery – it is an electronic part that was in the same housing as the energy store.
“We subsequently had problems with turbocharger and boost control systems with knock-on effects on the associated engine management systems, subsequently provoking mechanical failures.
Renault have made several attempts to solve the problems, with varying degrees of success. “Between days one and two with the help of Red Bull, we implemented a later level of hardware for the rest of the test to address the problem within the energy store. This ran for the remaining days.”
“In parallel to running in Jerez, the team at Viry has run dyno test programs to investigate the trackside problems and to propose solutions.
“We identified the probable root cause of our main turbo control issues, implemented some workarounds that were first seen at the end of day three and deployed in the three cars for day four. This established a very minimalist baseline from which we could build.”
“We recognise that when the cars have run, they are not running at an acceptable level,” White added.
“We are a long way from the type of operation we had planned and prepared for – largely as a result of the workarounds we have implemented – but all the information is useful.
“In dealing with the issues we have moved further away from the configuration we were comfortable with, which has resulted in the relatively slow times, but the running has given us a vastly greater understanding of the issues we face.
“We absolutely expect to have a more definitive solution in place for the next session in Bahrain.”



Fun times ahead for Renault, I believe these quotes have been posted before in this thread, but I think it was a reduced version?


<whistle>
For the guests :)


Welcome to Not606 F1 forum - Welcome thread

Sign up, takes just a minute and removes adds, as well as allowing more posts per page.
Plus you can chat to us, a charming lot :D


Register here:
http://www.not606.com/register.php
Click to expand...
 
Videos from testing:

[NSFW]
[video=youtube;5ch6nF69vl4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ch6nF69vl4[/video]

[video=youtube;SgxWJ2Tnb70]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgxWJ2Tnb70[/video]

[video=youtube;U1cODMLKAL0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1cODMLKAL0[/video]

[video=youtube;IGWRP7WASLE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGWRP7WASLE[/video]

[video=youtube;RcUWaECf9Wo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcUWaECf9Wo[/video]

[video=youtube;lOsneQvRRXs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOsneQvRRXs[/video]

[video=youtube;fbyNi3foQwk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbyNi3foQwk[/video]

[video=youtube;yiLcFYmxUDk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiLcFYmxUDk[/video][/NSFW]
 
With regards to the body language with the final day:

Mercedes: Both drivers calm and confident with what they're doing, nothing else stands out.

Williams: Massa seemed excited to progress with the car and looks up for a good fight to the start to the season, was almost boasting with his head movement being raised when openly talking about the rest of the field which is a sign of confidence. Was slightly irritated by the wet weather though.

Sauber: Lip biting so signs of anxiety and worry from Sutil with the car, looks like some of it might be sorted come Bahrain though and seemed calmer about the progress.

RBR: Daniel had confidence in the car being sorted quickly, was pretty hard to read anything significant to point out here. Would probably be best to see Seb's reactions as he is far more 'emotional'. Maybe their is a construction flaw with the Renault that can be easily fixed which might be the silver bullet RBR needs, but the 15-20 week problem could be if it's the worse case rather than what Renault is hoping not to happen.
 
I know, how is a photographer meant to make a living from one angle of a Red Bull halfway out of it's own box?


But on a serious note I doubt it would effect them for long, if anything it would encourage them even more to crush Alonso's dreams come the end of the season just like the last 4 years running and then we will see if they're laughing come November.

This is Red Bull, not Williams or Sauber.

P.S could you imagine Vettel winning the WDC with the double points system over the last 3 races? Would love to hear the Spanish fans then <laugh> be more tears than laughter. So if you REALLY! hate Vettel and Red Bull, it might be best if you wait until the end of the season to bang the drums rather than at the warm up lap when it really means nothing.

The heat of Bahrain is going to reveal how tough those Mercedes and Ferrari engines are as well in more standard F1 heat 25c + so problems for other teams still might happen considering how easy it happend to Red Bull and Renault.
 
In a funny sort of way even though I can't help having very deep feelings of glee about what is happening at Red Bull I would prefer it of their car wasn't such a dud that they couldn't even run it properly. I would rather that it was reliable, but maybe the third or fourth best car so we can have a season where the other teams at last get a crack of the whip but where the Red Bull isn't so bad that it's meaningless. I'd love to see Vettel have to fight hard to even get a podium, I think we would really see how good he is or isn't. I do think it would take something away from the championship as a whole to make him have to compete in some sort of clown car. Having said that, I love the idea of Merc/McLaren/Ferrari/Williams having a good ding dong battle this season. How refreshing that would be.
 
eddie_squidd:6018827 said:
Vettel have to fight hard to even get a podium, I think we would really see how good he is or isn't. I do think it would take something away from the championship as a whole to make him have to compete in some sort of clown car.
Click to expand...


That's pretty much how I feel too.
 
Dietrich trying to calm things down with Vettel perhaps?

"A deficit at the beginning of the season does not automatically mean that the world title is lost," he said. "Even if you come from behind, you still have a chance."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back