I am not even going to read past this opening statement as I have written down what I expected you to come up with and the this the first one was spot on ...end of
FROM MY 2 COFFEE MORNING MATES ref CLIFTONVILLE answers against the points I wrote down that would be his answers I have still not read them myself.. [they both support city but have not beem for 5 years/7 years due to transport / cost and ability to sit for 90 mins let alone walk for more than 2 minutes!] 1) [his answers] CV " city do not require 3 etc ... JG loopholes explanation ... CV stated SL said it, about control, but did not answer re his CV opinion that city did not need 3 or 4 other "other companies" 2) CV answer to finance and taxation, an admission that he knows JACK SCHITT .... ( note not my comment JG) 3) all Bristol sports .. answer is an opinion of what he would do waffle ( not my reply JG) 4) Pump up the ball .... named 1 person Doug Harman, but more than 1? 5 PILLARS ......... AB/MG so not coach's something to big has a lack of control, or kept to big is strain on finances with additional staff etc apparently it was a trimming down exercise? not a complete downsizing 5) good or bad ===no answer so apointless statement admitted Final comments were " he has an opinion loosely founded and does not know the answer to most of his statements and ....I wont print the rest " to me " don't keep on trying to correct stuff he publish's there is more important things to discuss over coffee than that, and whilst you have knowledge on certain aspects, and feel the need to express the right or wrong the majority on here it will be wasted on, they are just footballing fans and supporters like us that just want to see the team winning more than half their games each season"
