Observations from a win

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
E

EastEndCanary

Active Member
Feb 18, 2012
145
69
28
NULL
First - we won - away.

We won - and those three points get a really nasty monkey off our backs. Watch the teams who go through a couple more games without securing those three points - not fun.

Then there is the away element - can we look solid and threaten teams in our lower half mini league - I'm already confident we can. These could be invaluable points to keep us away from the danger zone.

There were a few other questions posed pre season - like can Hoolahan cut it in this division. I think that question is already answered and some. Three assists, composure and great work rate. Hoolahan has started the season brilliantly. Legend.

But the big story is Redmond. He has always been missing goals, but not any more.

Whatever AN does this season, the difference could be Redmond continuing to hit the onion bag. Right now you would back him to do that on a regular basis.

Two games down, two very different challenges, but two good performances and already belief, confidence and good football being played. Not so bad being back in the PL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canary Rob, KIO, JM Fan and 4 others
Very impressed with us going forward in both games, but we still need better defenders. Brady looked better today......Hoolahan is ****ing immense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rich44
NCFC84 said:
First of the promoted teams to win too. But there was very little to be negative about this game, it was the perfect performance. Grumpy people looking for any negatives should just relax, open a beer and enjoy the rest of the weekend.
Click to expand...
Exactly , <cheers>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rich44
Much to admire, but for me the highlight was the crisp passing and the clear understanding between the players, Sunderland couldn't deal with it and that made the difference. AN really has them working as a team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rich44
Some great comments here, very little negative from today just that little slip of concentration. Just need to tighten that up and we'll be golden.

I'm not convinced we need another CB as desperately as some think. I'm not saying we don't need one but if we can work a bit more and everyone plays to their potential I think we'll do ok.

Once Ollson is back too....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canary Rob
I've just watched yesterday's game again online and I felt it was a pretty good performance (even if Sunderland were there for the taking). As someone says on here, the crisp, quick passing was very nice to see.

I can't understand the people criticising Grabban when he came on. I thought he did a perfect job for a team who are leading, taking the ball to the corners and then winning several corner kicks which took any remaining sting out of the game.

I also felt Martin and Bassong both did very well. Martin's goal was a fluke, but he and Seb looked very solid against what I admit was a poor Sunderland attack.

Whittaker, another of the favourites of the boo boys, was excellent going forward. He may have defensive weaknesses but he can do things in attack that lots of full backs can't.

Hoolahan's touches for the assists were genius. He just seems to be getting better and better as he gets older.

And whatever happens this season - even if we go back down (which I don't think we will, unless Simon Hooper and his bent linesman referee a lot of our matches) - it looks like it's going to be a lot more fun than last time. Haven't felt this hopeful for a long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canary Rob, Rich44 and Walsh.i.am
RiverEndRick said:
Much to admire, but for me the highlight was the crisp passing and the clear understanding between the players, Sunderland couldn't deal with it and that made the difference. AN really has them working as a team.
Click to expand...

He certainly has and has continued in the same vein as we played at Wembley. From what I saw on MOTD, there were a lot fewer stray passes than we usually see. If we keep playing like this, we'll be fine whether or not we sign any star players!!!!
 
The real difference was them being 1st to each ball. There was a real hunger there and they hunted as a pack. If conceding a sloppy late goal is the only negative, lifes really not that bad after all.
 
Careful now criticising the boo boys you might get smacked ;-)

Motd was refreshing they didn't just say Sunderland were poor they actually heaped the praise on us too, glad I was sitting down!
 
Great post above (#9), SingaporeCanary <ok>
Bassong and Whittaker are transformed characters since Neil came in. Confident, assured, calm and knowing they have Tettey (and / or Mulumbu when fit) to patrol just in front of them gives them both licence to get forward more than they're accustomed.
Joking aside, if this Wisdom lad is any good, he could play at RB with Whittaker ahead of him as a RM, if needed.
This would free up Redmond to play in a slightly more central role, just behind the striker?
How strange that Whittaker has gone from being ironically applauded off when subbed vs Brentford when he was forced to play right mid, to now looking as if he may bring a new dynamic to that position if asked!
 
  • Like
Reactions: KIO
Cromercanary said:
Great post above (#9), SingaporeCanary <ok>
Bassong and Whittaker are transformed characters since Neil came in. Confident, assured, calm and knowing they have Tettey (and / or Mulumbu when fit) to patrol just in front of them gives them both licence to get forward more than they're accustomed.
Joking aside, if this Wisdom lad is any good, he could play at RB with Whittaker ahead of him as a RM, if needed.
This would free up Redmond to play in a slightly more central role, just behind the striker?
How strange that Whittaker has gone from being ironically applauded off when subbed vs Brentford when he was forced to play right mid, to now looking as if he may bring a new dynamic to that position if asked!
Click to expand...

The criticism of Whits was always based around his defensive duties. His attacking play has frequently been excellent. Even after the palace game where he took some flack, most had to admit he's a good attacking player.
 
Puncturedtractortyre said:
The real difference was them being 1st to each ball. There was a real hunger there and they hunted as a pack. If conceding a sloppy late goal is the only negative, lifes really not that bad after all.
Click to expand...


I don't really think the late goal was that sloppy. It was basically a mishit by the player, the ball bounced again, and then the flight became very difficult to predict.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back