Fair enough, at least now you can sleep a bit easier now you know he's saving us maoney and not actually costing the tax payer, as he would be on Channel Four.
I just spoke to Jezza and he says you're an even bigger ****er and you smell of wee. He also pointed out that Top Gear is the best selling show the BBC produce to sell internationally and he doesn't actually cost you anything. Personally, I don't really care about Clarkson one way or the other, Top Gear used to be decent, but for the past few years is just stuck to the same format and is desperately tired. Though as others have mentioned, he once twatted Piers Morgan and that's good enough for me.
People always use that like it's justification. Gangsters probably give a lot of money to charitable causes, it doesnt make it right. The work they do using public money is wrong in my eyes. I despise everything they have ever stood for, f**king ****s the lot of em. And for the record I hate Hammond more than Clarkson.
You brought up the fact he works for the BBC and shouldn't be paid with our money, but it's not our money, the programme is estimated to have around 350 million views per week in 170 different countries and that's what pays his wages. To be fair, I doubt he gives a **** what you think, he'd only have to take one look on here to see you're just an angry little man.
It is our money, this is the same as the argument you said last week about Spurs not spending any money last summer. Of course they did and of course he's funded with taxpayers money. It matters not one jot if it is then sold for a profit. What does it say on his wage slip - does he get 75 of them from every country that buys Top Gear and they all pay a percentage of his salary? Does it ****. He's paid with taxpayers money and they then recoup it from sales. Why did you change nob to "angry little man"? Im not little, Im 6ft and weight 13 stone.
Left wing jealousy makes me squirm. Success is evil and having an opinion is taboo. You might not like him but millions do and he makes millions out of it. I agree completely that the left wing rag that dredged this irrelevance up and made it news is the real culprit. Sad.
1. This isn't a left/right issue - it's a dickhead/non-dickhead issue. Left and right refer to economic policy. 2. Success is neither good nor evil; it depends on the nature of success. Hitler was successful between 1932 and 1940. More importantly it has nothing to do with the matter at hand. 3. Clarkson said a racial slur - that's not an opinion unless one is incapable of constructing an argument. 4. When do tabloids ever report on important issues? They only exist for football, tits and to service the outrage of the simple-minded.
I was going to post something similar but couldnt be arsed. I havent got a single cell of mine that is jealous of Clarkson, I just think he's a twat and anything that causes him harm is good by me. And you cant blame one news outlet for this story or for 'making it news'. If it wasnt news then only they would be reporting it and the world wouldve ignored it.
Correct. Also Richard Hammand has said ""that he can list a million things wrong with Clarkson but being a racist is Not one of them"". James May also said ""that he would not work with a racist"". Spot on ^^^^^ this. The mirror is a gutter paper only fit for fish and chips. It is one of the best TV programmes on the planet. The worldwide appeal of it shows no sign of ending either. Who cares what he said. People of a certain age used to sing that all the time. Too many people easily offended.
