This but Almiron instead of Murphy
Nah I think Murphy whips in decent balls and seems to find Isak well. Almiron should come on later as a goal threat as he doesn't create much.
This but Almiron instead of Murphy
Which one do you drop then and who do you bring in? Wilson is scoring and our best pen taker. Isak our best forward all round.
Maybe you can excuse dropping one now we have a mid week game.
I'd maybe give Gordon another shot at LW. He looked canny at times vs Southampton and made a few good runs in behind and looked dangerous.
Gordon--------------Isak-------------Murphy
----Willock-------Bruno----Joelinton------
Burn------Botman-------Schar---------Tripps
----------------------Pope----------------
It’s a tough one but yeah Wilson has to start and almiron also asm or Gordon maybe Gordon and targett for BDB?Which one do you drop then and who do you bring in? Wilson is scoring and our best pen taker. Isak our best forward all round.
Maybe you can excuse dropping one now we have a mid week game.
I'd maybe give Gordon another shot at LW. He looked canny at times vs Southampton and made a few good runs in behind and looked dangerous.
Gordon--------------Isak-------------Murphy
----Willock-------Bruno----Joelinton------
Burn------Botman-------Schar---------Tripps
----------------------Pope----------------
Good point he has been gash and to a lesser extent big joe has been lacking tooIf we're really dropping players based on the last few games it's golden balls Guimareas Joelinton Botman and burn, but they've done enough to see this season through.
Good point he has been gash and to a lesser extent big joe has been lacking too
It’s a tough one but yeah Wilson has to start and almiron also asm or Gordon maybe Gordon and targett for BDB?
It’s a tough one but yeah Wilson has to start and almiron also asm or Gordon maybe Gordon and targett for BDB?
Wilson doesn't have to start.
Why drop Dan Burn? He hasn't done anything wrong. He's not the problem here at all.
Targett is ****e.
Either or will suffice with one to come off the bench if required with regards to Burn love him and think he is a good player but we need a proper left back in there certainly an area we need to invest inWilson doesn't have to start.
Why drop Dan Burn? He hasn't done anything wrong. He's not the problem here at all.
Targett is ****e.
Either or will suffice with one to come off the bench if required with regards to Burn love him and think he is a good player but we need a proper left back in there certainly an area we need to invest in
Maybe EH is working on a front three that includes Wilson and Isak and or either Almiron, Murphy, ASM or Gordon but it’s a funny time to experiment Isak and Wilson were both working fine trading places every other match but now EH is insisting on starting both, the benefit is it also makes a stronger benchHe wants to drop players but not someone that played badly today.. Burn was crap today.
He's sighting a player with 17 goals as the issue instead I think.
Can it not just stay unchanged would be my question on this.
Would also love to analyse our conversion rate from free kicks and corners because it just doesn’t work does it or very rarely for such a big imposing side
EH has been listening to youWas thinking myself today.. the worst part is they take ages to take them.
Maybe EH is working on a front three that includes Wilson and Isak and or either Almiron, Murphy, ASM or Gordon but it’s a funny time to experiment Isak and Wilson were both working fine trading places every other match but now EH is insisting on starting both, the benefit is it also makes a stronger bench
And?
I remember players that completely lost it when we conceded i.e. Botman looked furious and inconsolable I agree there has been a shift for whatever reason but there does not seem to be the same approach to not conceding or keeping a clean sheet I mean the first goal today shocking defending really poorI'd make a case it's the defending that's become the issue..... there's an attitude change out there .. it's nonchalant all of a sudden.