NSR...Lagoon

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
PGFWhite said:
No, I am saying that everyone with an interest has a right to have that interest heard, The "moaners", as you call them, have just as much right to have their interest heard as those who want to plonk a concrete tidal lagoon in Swansea Bay. And yes, it IS up to those who want to alter the state of dynamic equilibrium in Swansea Bay to prove that any alteration will not have a significant detrimental effect on the area.

It is up to the decision makers to make the final decision based on all the evidence put before them - but the onus is on the tidal lagoon developers to make their case.
Click to expand...

And the developers are doing just that, putting the evidence forward. The moaners are just putting their moans forward, not evidence. They also have the onus to make their case, surely you don't think the default government stance is to side with the moaners until proven otherwise? That is what you are implying by saying the onus is on the developers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back