J
-jordan-
Guest
Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but what exactly was Fergie trying to do with a central midfield pairing of Giggs and Carrick? I know they are the pairing that has got us to the final recently and performed so well, but surely you pick a team not only to attack the opposition, but to counter their tactics as well? I cant see how a pairing of Giggs and Carrick can ever work against Xavi, Iniesta and Busquets, no matter how deep Rooney drops to help out.
In Rome in 2009, Giggs and Carrick were helped out by Anderson in a 3 man midfield. They were still given the run around (although not to the extent of last night) so why did Fergie think a 2 years older Giggs and a Carrick having taken a year and a half to get back to decent form could stop them on their own? Tactical suicide. Its all well and good having the threat of Hernandez up top, but that only works if you can get the ball off Barca in the first place. In the middle of midfield there was no ball winner, no legs, no engine, no strength and no pace.
Why wasnt Fletcher or Anderson given a look in? Instead Fergie stuck with the shockingly off the pace Giggs. When at last Carrick was dragged off, his replacements first contribution was to give the ball away in his own box resulting in the 3rd goal. Scholes appearance was nothing more than a damaged limitation exercise and possibly a farewell gesture. Also, why at 3-1 down was Guardiola the only manager out in his technical area? Had Fergie already thrown in the towel?
Another thing about last night confirmed what I've been saying all season. Evra is defensively our weak link. Constantly and consistently in no mans land, out of position and completely devoid of any defensive nous. Responsible for Pedro's and Messi's goals, and was also no-where to be found for Villa's.
Barca are incredible. The best club side I've ever seen. And it could be a case that no formation or tactic is the answer. Just a reliance on keeping it extremely solid, nicking a goal and hope they have an off day.
Fergie said lessons had been learned after Rome. Really? On the evidence of last night, Fergie is still tactically "naive" and major changes are needed in our midfield if we want to get within 10 yards of Barca next time.
In Rome in 2009, Giggs and Carrick were helped out by Anderson in a 3 man midfield. They were still given the run around (although not to the extent of last night) so why did Fergie think a 2 years older Giggs and a Carrick having taken a year and a half to get back to decent form could stop them on their own? Tactical suicide. Its all well and good having the threat of Hernandez up top, but that only works if you can get the ball off Barca in the first place. In the middle of midfield there was no ball winner, no legs, no engine, no strength and no pace.
Why wasnt Fletcher or Anderson given a look in? Instead Fergie stuck with the shockingly off the pace Giggs. When at last Carrick was dragged off, his replacements first contribution was to give the ball away in his own box resulting in the 3rd goal. Scholes appearance was nothing more than a damaged limitation exercise and possibly a farewell gesture. Also, why at 3-1 down was Guardiola the only manager out in his technical area? Had Fergie already thrown in the towel?
Another thing about last night confirmed what I've been saying all season. Evra is defensively our weak link. Constantly and consistently in no mans land, out of position and completely devoid of any defensive nous. Responsible for Pedro's and Messi's goals, and was also no-where to be found for Villa's.
Barca are incredible. The best club side I've ever seen. And it could be a case that no formation or tactic is the answer. Just a reliance on keeping it extremely solid, nicking a goal and hope they have an off day.
Fergie said lessons had been learned after Rome. Really? On the evidence of last night, Fergie is still tactically "naive" and major changes are needed in our midfield if we want to get within 10 yards of Barca next time.
