If the speculation that we have now bid £4 million for Matt Mills, are interested in Woodgate and are looking to get Ben Mee back are all true - it doesn't look like Tunc will be retained - shame - awesome when fully fit.
Not looking too good for Tunc
- Thread starter FosseFilberto
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
All I can say is, I hope another Championship club doesn't snap him up on a free, that would make paying 4 million for Mills seem idiotic.
Tunc would get more mins on the pitch then him.
Tunch has to be given an opportunity on the pitch and not just in training - He is a massively influential player (WHEN FIT)
We have one centre baack at the moment.
Even if we got St Ledger, Mills (by no means certain) and Mee we'd still need another.
Woodgate's just paper talk at the moment. I'd love to see Tunchev stay.
Even if we got St Ledger, Mills (by no means certain) and Mee we'd still need another.
Woodgate's just paper talk at the moment. I'd love to see Tunchev stay.
Woodgate - Stay well clear. He has bags of talent but spent most of his career on the physio table.
Tunch - Different story. He is our player and we had a duty to help him back whilst he was under contract. It would be great for Tunc and for Leicester if he could start playing again.
Tunch - Different story. He is our player and we had a duty to help him back whilst he was under contract. It would be great for Tunc and for Leicester if he could start playing again.
Cant believe we are at all interested in Woodgate, he would just be here for a meal ticket! His playing record speaks volumes.
Sven would not bring him here, he as tunc to get back to fitness first!
Sven would not bring him here, he as tunc to get back to fitness first!