North London Attack

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I dont agree with DMD that often, and dont agree with "The Prime Minister" at all.....on anything.
But on this, Highburyal, you are being a belligerent ****ing tool.

Why would you think DMD or anyone should denounce this idiot with "not in my name", for one you assume we are all Christians, we are not.
You assume the attacker is Christian.
If the attacker claims he carried out this attack in my name or in the name of anything remotely associated with me, i'll be denouncing quicker than a ma'****er.

Honestly though, looks like he carried out this attack in the name of Right Wing ignorance and utter twatness, to be honest.
Probably spurred on by rags like the Daily Mail and other media such as the contemptible Fox News over in the States.

Whatever the attackers 'reasons' are, and in the unlikely event that I agree with his 'argument', there is never a justification for such a cowardly act as he carried out.

It's why I unreservedly and with no hesitation condemn the act, with no ifs, buts or maybes.
 
I dont agree with DMD that often, and dont agree with "The Prime Minister" at all.....on anything.
But on this, Highburyal, you are being a belligerent ****ing tool.

Why would you think DMD or anyone should denounce this idiot with "not in my name", for one you assume we are all Christians, we are not.
You assume the attacker is Christian.
If the attacker claims he carried out this attack in my name or in the name of anything remotely associated with me, i'll be denouncing quicker than a ma'****er.

Honestly though, looks like he carried out this attack in the name of Right Wing ignorance and utter twatness, to be honest.
Probably spurred on by rags like the Daily Mail and other media such as the contemptible Fox News over in the States.
He's making the point that he was told, as a Muslim, he should be more vocal about denouncing violence from any nut job who calls himself Muslim - palpable nonsense. He's just putting the boot on the other foot. Right wing ignorance and utter twatness - that sounds like a few belong to that community. Having said that, it's gone too far on this thread. I understand HBs position, but I feel he's got carried away with it.
 
Whatever the attackers 'reasons' are, and in the unlikely event that I agree with his 'argument', there is never a justification for such a cowardly act as he carried out.

It's why I unreservedly and with no hesitation condemn the act, with no ifs, buts or maybes.
Indeed.
It should go without saying that everyone who isn't an extremist **** head disagrees with this guys actions.
Cowardly attacks on innocents will never make sense to me.
But highburyal saying where are the "not in my name" denouncements?
We don't know in whose name these attacks were carried out in yet, so why in the **** would anyone be saying that.
 
He's making the point that he was told, as a Muslim, he should be more vocal about denouncing violence from any nut job who calls himself Muslim - palpable nonsense. He's just putting the boot on the other foot. Right wing ignorance and utter twatness - that sounds like a few belong to that community. Having said that, it's gone too far on this thread. I understand HBs position, but I feel he's got carried away with it.

But how can he do that when he doesn't know the religious affiliation of the attacker, or the affiliations of the people on here who he is claiming should be denouncing this turd with "not in my name".
I for one, am no ****ing Christian.....
 
He's making the point that he was told, as a Muslim, he should be more vocal about denouncing violence from any nut job who calls himself Muslim - palpable nonsense. He's just putting the boot on the other foot. Right wing ignorance and utter twatness - that sounds like a few belong to that community. Having said that, it's gone too far on this thread. I understand HBs position, but I feel he's got carried away with it.

As you describe it is wrong. The argument was more about the 'we denounce it...but' type replies that some favour.

I'd say that there are no 'buts'.
 
But how can he do that when he doesn't know the religious affiliation of the attacker, or the affiliations of the people on here who he is claiming should be denouncing this turd with "not in my name".
I for one, am no ****ing Christian.....

I don't think it matters what name he claims it was in, it will never be in mine.
 
I dont agree with DMD that often, and dont agree with "The Prime Minister" at all.....on anything.
But on this, Highburyal, you are being a belligerent ****ing tool.
.
Your opinion am not going to lose any sleep over it, all of a sudden you got conscience? you want agree with those twats that's your problem...

Why would you think DMD or anyone should denounce this idiot with "not in my name", for one you assume we are all Christians, we are not.
You assume the attacker is Christian..
You talking of assumptions and yet talking out of your arse, where did I mention I thought the guy was Christian? show me otherwise stop talking bollocks as usual, your buddy that you agree with Claimed the guy was Jewish with no real source of information and I told the him off for spreading bullshit, you want suck his cock that's your business not mine.

If the attacker claims he carried out this attack in my name or in the name of anything remotely associated with me, i'll be denouncing quicker than a ma'****er..
Again like I said was just pointing out the hypocrisy of those, you don't like that's fine.

Honestly though, looks like he carried out this attack in the name of Right Wing ignorance and utter twatness, to be honest.
Probably spurred on by rags like the Daily Mail and other media such as the contemptible Fox News over in the States.
What does people like Duncan, Kustard and Dull have in common! Go read then do the conscience bit and be consistent at least....
 
The **** who did this attack is doing exactly what groups like ISIS want.
Their attacks turn non Muslims against Muslims, how many moderate muslims from that mosque will become indifferent, or even swayed, by extremist beliefs because of this Arseholes actions now?
Maybe none, but possibly some.....
 
But how can he do that when he doesn't know the religious affiliation of the attacker, or the affiliations of the people on here who he is claiming should be denouncing this turd with "not in my name".
I for one, am no ****ing Christian.....
I don't think it is for any of us to bear responsibility. Wherever the attack comes from.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodinki
But how can he do that when he doesn't know the religious affiliation of the attacker, or the affiliations of the people on here who he is claiming should be denouncing this turd with "not in my name".
I for one, am no ****ing Christian.....
Why does it have to have a religious affiliation? it could be an atheist for all we know...
 
I don't think it is for any of us to bear responsibility. Wherever the attack comes from.
This the truth I don't hold anyone else responsible for this guy, I was merely demonstrating hypocrisy of some posters here and out there in the media and social network...

The Dull came out with the guy being Jewish and what not with no evidence or truth to it yet...that's throwing petrol to the flames and he knows very well...