So according to NW, Bobby Reid isn't a striker then - so what is he? Why did we pay £10M for a striker who isn't one?
Having him on the bench we might have well not bothered, added another 10 mill and gone for a recognised striker who Neil believes really is one, and we wouldn't have a problem up front.
Any thoughts?
Having him on the bench we might have well not bothered, added another 10 mill and gone for a recognised striker who Neil believes really is one, and we wouldn't have a problem up front.
Any thoughts?


