Oh well.....Taarabt arguments to the last!! What else could we expect? Time for the talking to stop!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry.. but I can't see ANY sense whatsoever for SWP to replace Tarbs! Tarbs is even better in defense than SWP; let alone far better at taking on people up front and scaring the opponents defence!! Very, very.... VERY mysterious!!!!
I think SWP is in as a holding midfield role instead of Buz or Diakite, which judging by when he came on last week could be ok. But I'd have liked Adel in, but BZ out and Cisse up top in a 4 -5`1. With this team in a 4-4-2 we could easily be overun in midfield, if Cisse is playing wide midfield i 4-5-1 or 4-2-3-1 I underdstand leaving Adel out even less.
Hughes said what we had done away from home earlier hadn't worked so they would try something different today, hopefully this means Cisse up front instead of the flank. But why SWP is on and not Tarbs I can't get my head around, theres nothing he can do that Adel can't!
