err....I don't care about moderators or not, or what you had for lunch. Lets stick to the topic of BCFC please
err....I don't care about moderators or not, or what you had for lunch. Lets stick to the topic of BCFC please
I'm afraid we have a few people on this forum who love to criticise everything about this site.
Lan, it's not an issue but it's their right, they can always put their names forward to be a mod, if the site votes for them they are in and can change things to their liking, I am happy to step down if the members require it..

We can all get on our high horse, and we all need bringing down again. If most of us were sat in a pub, I'd imagine face to face, we would get on.
What rules?
. If most of us were sat in a pub, I'd imagine face to face, we would get on.
Conversely, the offer has been made for anyone that has problems with our forum that if they wish to put their selves up for consideration to be a mod, do so and the members will decide whether to vote them in or not, anyone wishing to do so let me know and I'm more than happy to be judged by my fellow members to continue or step down..
The mods appear to have some unwritten rules.
Its is ok for the mods to state they have no respect [and they have] for fellow fans, it is ok for the mods to start threads that are a direct attack [and they have] on other City websites. When challenged posters are threatened with bans, told they are boring, threads are locked, or mysteriously disappear.
The paradox is the mods choose to use the imagery of the fans and sites they have cast aspersions against.
The mods appear to have some unwritten rules.
Its is ok for the mods to state they have no respect [and they have] for fellow fans, it is ok for the mods to start threads that are a direct attack [and they have] on other City websites. When challenged posters are threatened with bans, told they are boring, threads are locked, or mysteriously disappear.
The paradox is the mods choose to use the imagery of the fans and sites they have cast aspersions against.

I am a moderator on a large-scale Web Developer forum, so I've got experience of opinionated posts under the guise of being a moderator.
Frankly, I don't see why it's taken two pages of passive-aggressive posts to clear the air. I doubt anyone really thinks that there is some kind of agenda by the mods against the manager. That being said, the moderators need to stop being so defensive when it comes to criticism. The entire point of a forum is to discuss Bristol City, and whether you like it or not, your criticism of the club is as much up for discussion as the results themselves.
I get it enough on other forums, and it's often a thankless task, but that's what happens when you get the word "Moderator" under your user name. It's the price you pay for being a representative of the City fans on this forum, I'm afraid.
I've taken my fair share of shots at Angelicnumber16 and Shinycitylad7 for being negative. That's to be expected on a forum when you make a statement that others won't agree with. At times, they've responded to that shot. That's how forums work. Your posts are in no way related to how good a moderator you are, and considering the lack of spam on this forum, the moderators do a bloody good job.
. Yes I can be negative but I would say 95% of the time im a very positive person on this site, like you say when you get the moderator tag you become a target. I'm not sure why we are though as we are only a moderator to help the supermods out, Our only job is to keep the site clean of racism, aggressive behaviour and spam, we're not here to spread cheer etc, just to keep our site ticking, which by being the 12th busiest team on this site, we're doing an alright jobNobody has ever been threatened to be banned mate. Clearly you don't understand a joke, as for meeting someone on here who I feel was fairly aggressive towards me and only out for an argument, why should I meet them?