That's the point Bobby...he ain't promised...The construction firm are the issue not Levy imo.
He is giving the information he has and is being accused of being too seceretive...makes no sense to me.
He has guided us from being a lower table relegation threatened club with a stadium that was too small to being almost permanently in Europe and regularly in the top 4 and we will have a fantastic ground which will raise even more money and hopefully help us improve on the pitch.
Football has lost it's patience and it's memory in my view.
No club has tried to do anything like this - knock down an existing stadium and build an entirely new, multi-purpose, state of the art, one on the same site. Add in the fact that it's on a busy main London road and it was always a monumental task. That also means expensive, very,very expensive, very, very, London expensive.
The stadium wasn't built with state money or from dodgy sources. It's been borrowed from proper banks and there's interest to be paid. It's in English football's interests to have a stadium like our new one. It sets a precedent for top notch facilities internally and in our profile around the world. Spurs don't have the money to build it and let it lie empty and idle when finished. If we get into financial trouble, who will ever build anything so great again?
I think that the PL was prepared to cut Spurs a bit of slack and that some slippage from the Liverpool game was seen as possible and acceptable. We had a contingency with Wembley until the end of December, going back well before delays were suggested or rumoured, let alone confirmed. It's not possible that the PL knew nothing of this. Wembley's owners leak like a sieve, even if we wanted it kept quiet.
I doubt that anyone,including Daniel Levy thought that potential slippage would extend this far. The Wembley December extension contingency date suggests what was considered a long stop of a reasonable length. We've hit a more major problem. That's very bad news for us financially and our reputation is getting a kicking from the gutter press. However, the terms of the ST contracts made very clear that they were for the new Stadium ONLY and that would necessitate refunds if the intention of the contract was frustrated. It's a legal obligation with terms and conditions working both ways, not "a promise".
Any undertakings give to the PL would have had the usual caveats, that Spurs are in the hands of contractors (lots of them) and subject to the vagaries of the weather and other potential difficulties. Levy was in no position to make the chairmen of the other clubs any promises. I'd be amazed if any asked for such a thing and expected to get it. These are experienced businessmen, not small children.
Labelling any undertaking as a promise and suggesting that failure to meet projected completion dates Levy's fault devalues your point. Spurs are meeting their legal obligations but they're not covering themselves in glory by continuing to be secretive about a regular feature of major, ground-breaking construction. The true issues are who ****ed up on the security system (Levy's not an electrician, site supervisor or anything of that nature) and how have Spurs made such a terrible bollocks of the PR of what is a stunning project?