Yet another mouth to feed. x PS. As we're all in this together I can't wait to ask them down the food bank x
If they have any more and Cameron gets back in will he cap their family allowance? (How about calling her Di, just to annoy the jug-eared t##t)
Brilliant stuff from Billy (unsurpisingly) and JPF. A rich ****er who no-one will ever meet shags another rich ****er who no-one will ever meet and has a kid who no-one will ever meet. And we're supposed to have any interest in this ****e? No doubt a bairn will have been born to a stranger in the town I live in today, but I'm not bombing to the town hall to find out and then racing to the address to gape at the bairn. Just shows how ****e all the political leaders are, going on about this being "wonderful". Anyway, how are these two scroungers going to look after this bairn? Neither seem to have a proper job. They're dependent on state hand-outs. The French had the right solution to the royal family.
Buckingham Palace has announced that the new royal baby has been placed on a life support system. The Civil List
Looks like we have a site full of staunch royalists... I',m totally apathetic about the whole thing, although the Duchess of Cambridge is certainly a looker..
She's a titless wonder imo. How the **** does she feed the bairns with such scrawny, tiny tits? I'm pleased Ethel was born healthy though. Wouldn't shag Kate with yours RAW.
If you'd prefer a system where the government of the country is paralysed for three months while the new President is ratified, good for you. But I'm proud of the present system where 'the king is dead, long live the king' and government can continue this morning if necessary with no break in it. That, to me, is the government of survivors and winners. It's everyone's own choice, I know, but me, I'm a staunch royalist. God bless the bairn. To hell with envy, the NHS wastes every day more than we pay the royals. And PC education is little if any better. Just my opinion.
**** off man ya wassick tosser, lol. The king or queen has **** all say in government policy. As for the NHS wasting money, it does I quite agree but see how far you get if you've got cancer when you knock on Lizzie's door. She'd tell you to fork orf. That's how much she gives a toss about you or me.
If it is not Diana it means step mum and grandma have put their foot down, and Wills the wimp has given in!
Billy, first and foremost, I've 'liked' your post for the excellent "wassick tosser". Look, I agree with a lot of what has been said here, and especially your point that the monarch has no say in government policy. But the value of the monarchy is simply that it's there. We don't waste months electing new presidents here. If it was ever necessary, our government could meet and operate normally within (literally) one-tenth of a second of a reigning monarch dying because there is a new head of state in place immediately. It doesn't even have to be discussed. One other important factor is that the politicians don't have guns to hold at our heads - the commanding officer of our military is the monarch. If the monarch says that regiment will not be moved to x, then that is law. Tyranny becomes a whole lot harder. It's a brilliant system, proven over centuries. And what we pay them is peanuts. I'd keep it.
I don't agree with what you've written mate, but your opinion is certainly logical and makes sense. Opinions and all that. But even if you agree with the monarchy, here we're talking about making a fuss, not about the constitutional role of the Queen, or even some news about her personally, or even about one of her children - but about one of her grandkids! FFS, what is this worshipping the extended family of the head of state about? Who gives a toss what a couple of rich scroungers have named their kid? It's the main news story on the BBC UK news site FFS!
