He would not do a live interview with Jordan involved. Because he is a fraud and Jordan would rip him a new one.
I thought the ESI Range Rovers were black or white Never mind. Good luck to all stream buyers, it's a nice bit of CAFC bling I guess. Wouldn't have one myself. This kind of vehicle is totally unnecessary in urban & suburban environments. Or motorways & main rural roads. I wonder how many upper-middle class XR sympathisers have one of them on the gravel front driveway.
Elliott is a bit of a prick. He's reinvented himself as a well spoken middle dude. Am convinced he's gone to elocution lessons. Even the @Appalling Rug has more Sarf London tones than him. Elliott is Charlton tbf.
Good to see Sandgaard using the media to take the piss out of ESI. Elliott is being treated with the derision that he deserves.
I just listened to Sandgaard’s riposte to Elliott’s interview yesterday. Brilliant stuff. He has drawn to the EFL’s attention that ‘characters’ should not be allowed to buy English football clubs, put no money in, and then hope something turns up like central payments. Who could he be referring to ? He correctly points out that this is not fair to fans, and that the EFL are changing their rules on this Regarding Elliott’s claim that Sandgaard is fond of media stunts, he points out that he deposited £12m on his own money into the club’s bank account, and that this money is still there. Regarding the legal threats, he says that his ownership of CAFC is “watertight” and that any legal dispute is between Elliott / Farnell and Nimer as to who owns ESI. A nice pay off line from TS on this .... “ I don’t think there’s much money to argue over”
Simon Jordan came out with re Elliott, "he probably does not own the trousers he is wearing" I take back everything I have said about him in the past, he nails it every time. Still a palice coont though.
Given all that he did against ESI, I find it pretty poor that the club & certain individuals refuse to acknowledge or involve Dodger. Can only guess at the reasons why.
