New Manager

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Mckechnie Orange said:
Did you listen to it? Because he compared Ozan to Connolly and said these things happen, fair enough. His point was why are we playing an unfit striker and leaving Ohio out entirely, who when he did play was productive.

It's why I think it was clumsy, but not in the eviscerating way it's been interpreted by some.

It's just unusual in our culture to name names unless you're trying to pin blame
Click to expand...

Ohio was visibly unfit too, and I don't really understand Acun's point as we've not seen Connolly since he 'fouled' the Norwich keeper.

And no it shouldn't happen. If a player is substantially unfit when they're doing a medical they shouldn't be signed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
Shark Sports said:
Ohio was visibly unfit too, and I don't really understand Acun's point as we've not seen Connolly since he 'fouled' the Norwich keeper.
Click to expand...

I think you're getting to the point where you're attempting to dig into the minutia of something you probably haven't seen.

He tried to use specific examples to illustrate how the board/recruitment team and Liam's ideas were different in terms of the talent he had. He shouldn't have named names and a more eloquent deployment of the English language could have achieved that through inference and implications without naming names.

He tried to caveat what he was saying in relation to each, but I think it came across as more personal than intended.
 
Cityzen said:
He mentioned both. Seems every group should not be criticised. Except white English males
Click to expand...

It might be because that particular group have become very whiney recently about everybody else getting more attention.

Of course every group can be criticised, it's why the criticism is levelled that matters.

SWCM (or swackums as they're sometimes lovingly referred to) have become a bit of a meme, but that always happens when the loudest voices that represent those groups are daft as a brush.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14 and Drew
Steven Toast said:
It might be because that particular group have become very whiney recently about everybody else getting more attention.

Of course every group can be criticised, it's why the criticism is levelled that matters.

SWCM (or swackums as they're sometimes lovingly referred to) have become a bit of a meme, but that always happens when the loudest voices that represent those groups are daft as a brush.
Click to expand...

South west coastal monitoring do a decent job

Headquartered in plymouth also
Nice area
 
  • Like
Reactions: Steven Toast
Cityzen said:
I am sure you will get over your feelings of inadequacy with a little help.
Click to expand...

I'm not criticising anybody, not challenging anybody challenging that criticism.

Just think you're acting like a petulant kid not getting the attention he deserves. Waaa.

But keep going if you want. It's your life...
 
Mckechnie Orange said:
I'm not criticising anybody, not challenging anybody challenging that criticism.

Just think you're acting like a petulant kid not getting the attention he deserves. But keep going if you want. It's your life...
Click to expand...

Bit of a daft lad, aren’t you? Petulant about what? You come across as that type.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back