I felt like throwing my toys out...
It may be saying the obvious but just looking at the stats of defence and attack of the league winners hardly give any conclusive evidence of which is more important. Spurs coming second with the best defence and attack seem to confirm that.
All I can say with certainty is that the league winners cannot have either a rubbish defence or a rubbish attack. A brilliant attack must be back by a decent defence and vice versa. Wins are more important than defeats so intuitively I would choose the former rather than the latter given the choice.
Exactly.
These stats are also skewed by teams no longer giving a shot when it's already won.
I mean let's face it a party occurred for John Terry while spurs won by 6 on last day so goals scored totally flipped last day.
In the end both spurs and Chelsea have <1goal a game conceeded and >2 goals scored per game so it was draws that scored them out and spurs drew 8.