Negative Spin

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Bib Fortuna's Maw

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2011
11,729
755
113
zippidy bang ba zoopla
I read this article this morning - it's proper unbelievable.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/spl-loses-17m-in-tv-deal-1198156

Massive cash blow for SPL as they lose £17m in new TV deal

AFTER weeks of negotiations a new five-year Sky agreement has been clinched but it’s well short of the millions on offer when Rangers were in the SPL.

THE collapse of Rangers has cost the SPL a massive £17million from one TV
deal alone.

After weeks of negotiations the game’s top flight finally clinched a new five-year
Sky agreement yesterday but it’s well short of the millions on offer when Rangers were in the SPL.

Last year Sky and the country’s leading clubs had settled on £80m over five years but the contracts were never signed. And it’s believed the deal will give the SPL only £63m over a similar period.

But from that figure £9m will have to be paid to the SFL over the next three years and then £4m over the remaining two years of the deal.

That, of course, means several SPL clubs are still facing financial hardship.

With Rangers in the Third Division the SFL were able to sell their TV rights to the SPL for just more than £1m a year for the next three years and that fee will have to come out of the new Sky deal.

The SPL must also pay a £2m settlement fee – agreed when the top clubs broke away in 1998 – every year and that, too, will be taken out of the new telly package.

So, with SPL chief executive Neil Doncaster and Celtic chief Peter Lawwell, who led the negotiating team, having agreed a new package worth just less than £13m a year the amount to be spread among the 12 top clubs is actually only around £10m a year for the next three years.

For the remaining two years of the deal the figure will be closer to £11m, although there will be clauses in the new agreement which will allow for an increase should Rangers win promotion every season for the next three.

Staggering.

It's like an attempted murder being reported as "man saves life by using blade which is too short".
 
So you find tabloid journalism unbelievable? Unbelievable:emoticon-0105-wink:

I'm sure he doesn't but, like me, he finds the blatant attempt at spinning it as a negative news story staggering. Clearly there is a policy within the sports section of the Daily Record to put a pessimistic spin on any story relating to a Rangers-free SPL.

Anyone who heard Shug Keevins on the radio on Monday night would think Scottish football was on a par with the League of Wales!
 
So you find tabloid journalism unbelievable? Unbelievable:emoticon-0105-wink:

No, it's just that there is an obvious way to report this story - the way every other outlet has yet the Record sticks to its repeated doom and gloom mantra and it's laughable.

There's been talk from some people about people's "agendas" from fans of all sides (alright, I'll elaborate - Chris Graham, in particular, has accused most of the country of an agenda against Rangers) when reporting like the above is the most blatantly piece of biased journalism I've arguably ever witnessed.

Honestly, read it again and read other news outlets versions of this.

It's up there with the succulent lamb session.