NDong

Teessidemackem

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
19,935
26,061
113
Doesnt he have to play 75% of Watfords games to activate a permanant transfer??
Well he started on the bench yet again and finished on the bench again today for Watford.
Some might say Karma to him for asking to leave and not having the balls or the respect to us for bringing him over to England in the first place to see the season out with us, but in reality like Djib i reckon were going to be stuck with 21m worth of shyte next season in whatever league we are in.
 
I read that they have no obligations to buy him even if he played every game. This is why I was pissed off with Bain for telling Coleman that this sort of thing wouldn't happen. So Coleman said it publicly, then Bain made him look like a cock by doing the exact opposite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
I read that they have no obligations to buy him even if he played every game. This is why I was pissed off with Bain for telling Coleman that this sort of thing wouldn't happen. So Coleman said it publicly, then Bain made him look like a cock by doing the exact opposite.

If true that is properly ****e. There's a big difference between the Championship and League 1, if you're going to weaken your playing squad you need to damn well make sure you're getting something good out of it.
 
If true that is properly ****e. There's a big difference between the Championship and League 1, if you're going to weaken your playing squad you need to damn well make sure you're getting something good out of it.

We need to free wages to bring in players, that was the priority and it should have been transparent.

We have had no contact for any of these players except for Ndong, and that was a loan deal that we are not prepared to do because we would stand to gain nothing out of that.

“We’ve had a couple of enquiries about Didier but for loan deals and that’s not going to work for Sunderland Football Club.

That was said by Coleman before the loan. You don't say **** like that unless you've been told that's the situation by your Cheif Exc. Bain made him look a right dickhead when we packed him off on loan. We all knew we have no leverage what so ever when our limitations are as public as they are, so why not just say from the off, we'll generate wage space how ever we can. It's just the bullshit prior that's pissed me off. Fooled nobody(Watford called our bluff and got the loan). Just more examples of how poorly we're run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nacho and haslam
We need to free wages to bring in players, that was the priority and it should have been transparent.



That was said by Coleman before the loan. You don't say **** like that unless you've been told that's the situation by your Cheif Exc. Bain made him look a right dickhead when we packed him off on loan. We all knew we have no leverage what so ever when our limitations are as public as they are, so why not just say from the off, we'll generate wage space how ever we can. It's just the bullshit prior that's pissed me off. Fooled nobody(Watford called our bluff and got the loan). Just more examples of how poorly we're run.

Yeah I'm supportive of Bain on the whole but this was badly handled. The one thing we don't want to do is bullshit Coleman, he's a big boy and can deal with bad situations but he won't like being lied to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brian Storm
Yeah I'm supportive of Bain on the whole but this was badly handled. The one thing we don't want to do is bullshit Coleman, he's a big boy and can deal with bad situations but he won't like being lied to.

Agreed. He's been completely professional about it but I don't doubt he's had words about this. He's too straight talking not have pulled Bain about it. It was a cheap play from Bain, and it lost my trust in him. I now want him gone as quickly as Short. Unacceptable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nads