Yes, and arguably a remaining apathetic silent majority, a waste of time at the wrong time. Best thing for the Allams now is to except the FA decision next week with grace, CTWD to offer an olive branch not a kick in the bollocks, forge a reunited fanbase as Hull City, all enjoy winning the FA Cup together and move on from strength to strength.
A small point, it would be nice to know the split between email and paper votes. If there's 400 blank pdfs to be sorted out then that's over 6% of the total votes cast. When you consider that they're only going to have blank forms from the email votes it makes you wonder what the % is in that respect. I've also just done a bit of research. Assuming 11,000 out of 18,000 season ticket holders are in the over 16s categories the turnout at 6,500 vites is 59.1%. At the last General Election the turnout in Hull was 52.5% (all 3 constituencies combined). So when people are saying it's a poor turnout, it's got more eligible voters voting than deciding who should run the country manages.
I suspect the 400 votes to be checked are not all blank. What Mooney actually said, was that 400 votes needed to be clarified. We know from votes copied to CTWD, that quite a lot of people added 'and want the Allam's to stay' to No votes, I wouldn't be surprised if they're being told they either have to vote Yes with the Allam's, or No.
Don't bother ringing to clarify which way people voted do what we do over here and count all votes A) YES. Good luck with your ballot but I can't see you matching our recent 100% turnout. Kim Il Dat Sun 10 Arcadia Avenue Pyongyang North Korea Exclusive picture: Is this a fanatical Hull City season ticket holder voting A) YES. I hope not. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n-100-turnout-helpfully-one-ballot-paper.html
