Cons:
Very ugly football in the first half, played into West Ham's hands.
Very little going forward.
Poor marking for the second goal.
Pros:
Declan John had a very good game. Looks promising.
When we started passing the ball around (in the second half) West Ham couldn't get near us.
Fraizer Campbell giving Medel a hand with the Ayatollah.
Summary:
Nobody really had a bad game. West ham were a lot more clinical (as expected) but if we played like we did in the second half, as opposed to the first half of tennis, I can't see us getting relegated. It's a bit naïve to say that after 1 game, but we still have Cornelius to come back from injury and hopefully a new winger.
Exciting times
Very ugly football in the first half, played into West Ham's hands.
Very little going forward.
Poor marking for the second goal.
Pros:
Declan John had a very good game. Looks promising.
When we started passing the ball around (in the second half) West Ham couldn't get near us.
Fraizer Campbell giving Medel a hand with the Ayatollah.
Summary:
Nobody really had a bad game. West ham were a lot more clinical (as expected) but if we played like we did in the second half, as opposed to the first half of tennis, I can't see us getting relegated. It's a bit naïve to say that after 1 game, but we still have Cornelius to come back from injury and hopefully a new winger.
Exciting times

