My previous postings

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I agree with the gist of what you say (in that post) and have not disagreed with you, or I don't believe I have. The first post of this thread was Robo more or less stating that he felt folk (he included himself) had got it wrong; in that I agree with him, he got it wrong and he was ably assisted by the usual baiters and trolls.

I'm not trying to police anything here; if you want to swear then fine, there's the filter for that, if you want to tell jokes, then fine, but keep them non-**** and non-racist and it might be prudent to respect the innocent family members of the posting community. Is that really too much to expect on a community football forum that has made itself representative in the wider community of the city?


I think you have to put up with it I'm afraid and accept that if you participate in a forum that has specifically attempted to avoid any real code of conduct, then you have to use your judgement as to whether you should read certain threads or not.
 
<laugh> . I've got loads of Suited's mrs but no sister!!

Though i do agree with Fez, i didnt like the racist, **** jokes. Not good.

If you check back, I was on that sick joke thread being as vociferous as you in my condemnation of the majority of the jokes on that thread.

Does that mean you think I'm a nasty, sick, vile, horrible excuse for a human being who is using this site as a means for grooming underage boys then?
 
I think you have to put up with it I'm afraid and accept that if you participate in a forum that has specifically attempted to avoid any real code of conduct, then you have to use your judgement as to whether you should read certain threads or not.

You must log in or register to see images
 
A bit dramatic that Fez. I don't see anything on here,that could remotely suggest child grooming.

I spent months fighting to have the groomer who posted as James Lodge removed from the HDM site and got hardly any support from other posters. I was called obsessive by some, both online and in private.

I cannot say that I have ever read any posts that indicate any grooming activity.

Where have I said that there are posters carrying out grooming on here? I have used the example of the two perves, who are from Doncaster, who are currently in the frame for countless cases of grooming on all sorts of sites, under numerous identities. My point is that when we accept some of the **** I have seen on here as normal and acceptable, we create an ideal environment for the perverts to slip in under the radar. I often see posts on here that I, and others, judging by their comments, suspect to be coming from immature teenagers and yes, they are vulnerable immature teenagers. I accept that it will continue on here or elsewhere, and I will continue to protest against it, as I believe it is fundamentally more important that the name-change campaign, which I also support.
 
This reminded me of a conversation my Mrs had with our 13 year old last week. They were talking about video games being related to mass murders & rape as she thought he was spending a little too much time on HALO, COD & GTA.

He replied

"You watch The Great British Bake Off. It doesn't mean you're gonna turn into a baker, although we can live in hope"

Sarcy little twat, I don't know where he gets it from. I pissed my pants.

Rofl, thats fookin ace. And Im gonna steal that for my own use.
 
In case there's any parents of posters looking in, most of the moderation of the board ticks away quietly in the background. We discuss suspicious posts and posting patterns. If someone was using the internet for grooming, they'd clearly stand out a mile on here.

Also, there are 'rules' for posting, but they tend to be general rather than specific and most people are comfortable with that.

The simplest way if you've an issue, and the one most people use is to PM a mod and we'll act accordingly and quietly in the background, to save the board being cluttered with mod stuff rather than chatter.
 
Fez, you alluded to simular techniques being employed. I understand where you are coming from and I am only saying that I haven't seen evidence of grooming. I'm not disagreeing with your stance regarding the content of the "jokes". I should point out that it really is a good job that you didn't appear to have read the deleted post that mentioned you and Chaz earlier.
 
Fez, I'm just wondering, what is your opinion on people who enjoy extreme movies such as horror, black comedy etc.

Are they all lunatics who are going to go on a crazed ethnic clensing genocide campaign? Are they all vile human beings? Do they lack moral standards?

Do you think they'd sit there and watch with keen fascination whilst another human being is being mercilessly hacked to pieces?

What about the film writers, producers and actors who agree to work on it?

We have a system of censorship and I live by that as most do. What's your definition of extreme, I mean, I know you enjoy the good old baby-rape jokes and extreme racism is right down your street, so where does extreme go for you?

You may of missed it, but there is good evidence that shows a link between extreme film/games,etc and the mal-adustment of some individuals who go on to carry out some pretty dreadful deeds; but of course, to some it just comes naturally, don't you think?
 
Fez, you alluded to simular techniques being employed. I understand where you are coming from and I am only saying that I haven't seen evidence of grooming. I'm not disagreeing with your stance regarding the content of the "jokes". I should point out that it really is a good job that you didn't appear to have read the deleted post that mentioned you and Chaz earlier.

Mel, there are no guarantees in life, but for someone to try to squeeze grooming into a discussion on events on this board smacks of their lack of understanding of how the board works.
 
Big Sue from Hull (38) who likes paragliding, walks on the beach, Viking reenactments and spending time with her 3 pugs?!?!?!?

The very same.

Game old bird is Big Sue.


I was thinking of joining a Viking reenactment group in the hope I might get to share a tent with Big Sue, she'd keep you warm on a cold winters night.

Plenty to get hold of.

Suited is a lucky man.
 
The very same.

Game old bird is Big Sue.


I was thinking of joining a Viking reenactment group in the hope I might get to share a tent with Big Sue, she'd keep you warm on a cold winters night.

Plenty to get hold of.

Suited is a lucky man.

Biggest plaits this side of Goole. Make sure you turn the tent light off, we don't want to see the robust outline of the Don pillaging Sue's hamlet!
 
Fez, you alluded to simular techniques being employed. I understand where you are coming from and I am only saying that I haven't seen evidence of grooming. I'm not disagreeing with your stance regarding the content of the "jokes". I should point out that it really is a good job that you didn't appear to have read the deleted post that mentioned you and Chaz earlier.

I understand where you stand, Mel; some of the banter and kidology on here are similar to the techniques of groomers, it how they seek to be missed in the crowd.

I also accept that the moderators do a valued and voluntary job and have said so on more occasions than the once when I believe they misjudged the situation over the extreme jokes. I never saw the joke or comment made against me, but nothing would surprise me, as there are a small number who confuse their democratic rights with their social responsibility - just as another poster remarked, it would be a good call that they wouldn't be as brave this side of their keyboard - just an observation, not an offer to meet in Linnets car park. :laugh: