My political agenda

Surely the cost of developments in London + the higher population density makes it about the same?

 

It won't be a walk in the park that's for sure.

 

this^

 

No, Toby.

Not even close.

 

If Brian Blessed kidnapped you and forced you into some sort of gimp/bdsm dungeon scenario, would you rather be the postman or the letterbox?

 

It must cost a ****ing fortune to build stuff in London, I doubt it's the same for somewhere like Middlesbourough.

 

^^^^^^^^^****y ***** say what?

 

Land purchases are a tiny proportion of the cost though. The differences in wages, etc are not enough to make up for the huge differences in spending. The reason for the difference is this London-centric bubble the westminster Parliament is caught up in.

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-16235349

Granted its an old story but its still a ridiculous gap in spending.

 

I don't know but the way you went out Gus was amazing *adjusts tie*

 

That would come under additional benefits.

 

Fair play, I didn't realise the gap was that big.

I just know that most places in London cost a ****ing fortune to sort out, even simply putting a new bus stop in, but the gap is a bit ****ed...

£5 per head in most the rest of the country? Do they lend a town 1 bike and tell them to pass it round to the next one every year?

 

Do they ****. The bastards hire it out and charge us!

 

UKIP have infiltrated us!

 

Dyslexic locals hang out there being disappointed that no unattended children turn up?

 

FFS

 

Bent over the sofa

 

It was either that or raise it to the ground twin towers style.