Mr Integrity strikes again

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Those of you questioning Rodgers ethics (or lack of) may care to consider this from the BBC:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18314658

Now, I wonder if, by making his interest public, he is deliberately unsettling the player and prejudicing his move?

I do wonder.....honestly.

Gylfi should go to Liverpool, it will be a better move for Our Boys. He will be is a better team and this season will not be fighting to stay in the premiership.
 
Rodgers has made very clear and very public that he only took the job because he was assured that he would not be working under a director of football.

Was that a thinly veiled swipe at Reading's Nick Hammond by any chance? I hope so.
 
I was surprised that a bigger club than Swansea wasn't going for him (and equally surprised that Swansea would ever spend that money on one player, however good he is and however high their Premier League position).

Whatever the politics of the transfer, I love the idea of an Icelandic kid replacing Steven Gerrard.