He can't apparently as there was no recall clause in the loan contract.
Is the right answer.
We paid £3m for a full seasons loan.
He can't apparently as there was no recall clause in the loan contract.
Is the right answer.
We paid £3m for a full seasons loan.
Bloody steal that... to each their own but Chav's would have been far better off keeping him, their loss your gain I guess.
Given just how 'well' they performed against Citeh, with Valencia giving up on defensive duties and letting runners past at will, and him the winger who 'tracks back', Carrick retreating into his crab shell and the creaking and aging bones of Vidic and Rio at the back being held together by SAF's bespoke training regimes and RVP's overtraining into injury, I'd say the wheels are coming off the wagon.
RVP's injury doesn't bode well for the specially devised training programmes that help Rio stay fit (remember Rio's reasons for not going to Euro 2012, so Terry got his recall instead...) and without RVFragileglass to score goals, you are struggling to see how they are going to score enough to get into the top 4, let alone challenge.
This could be the season that everything changes. No United or Chelsea in the top 4? Its altogether possible, even if not probable. Surely someone with tell Jose to play Mata and recall Lukaku???

Is the right answer.
We paid £3m for a full seasons loan.
Excellent player. I'd said all summer that I rate Lakaku higher than Benteke, he is a much better and more consistent player IMO.
It was a great signing for Everton but £3m for a season loan isn't that cheap IMO.

Every league place is worth over £1m & we shafted United for £4m over Fellaini's release clause in the last knockings of the window don't forget, so everything is relative......looks a snip when compared to torching £35m in 2 seasons for the big gypo & Clowning btw
If the lad has a great season & Chelsea land Rooney or AN other World superstar next summer, then the possibility of the lad being available on a permanent might arise - in which case the years loan fee might look like a total bargain if the lad decides he loves it here.
Every league place is worth over £1m & we shafted United for £4m over Fellaini's release clause in the last knockings of the window don't forget, so everything is relative......looks a snip when compared to torching £35m in 2 seasons for the big gypo & Clowning btw
If the lad has a great season & Chelsea land Rooney or AN other World superstar next summer, then the possibility of the lad being available on a permanent might arise - in which case the years loan fee might look like a total bargain if the lad decides he loves it here.

so what are you saying? with out him you were 11th and with him and barry you are 6th? 5 places = 5million?
If lukaku becomes available he will not sign for everton permanently. Just so you know my thoughts on it. that's no shame or anything or not even really knocking everton is a bit of banter, its just an honest opinion on what i think is something that's a bit obvious.
Yes you shafted utd for 4mil. thats great well done, and well done for keeping baines too. but thats irrelevant to lukaku's deal. you got so much for sideshow bob that you coula afford it 4mil extra or no but the fact is you are being very hopeful if you think a guy who could say get you 25 goals and uefa cup on a loan would sign up when a long queue of higher paying clubs will line up for him.
finally... 35mil? lfc can well afford it as evidenced finally by our shoveling our summer transfer budget on a defender for 17mil or something just because....
Ok mate so the 'mighty' LFC can torch £35m on dumb & dumber & it's nothing to be bothered about, but EFC paying a £3m loan fee for a striker who'll be in the running for the PL top scorer this season is somehow a big deal?

I find it funny that during the summer tobes you were saying how great moyes was for you and how great felliani was too....
but thats only natural i suppose. LFc fans were laughing at your legend at old trafford so you defended him.
I think i'm right in saying that its cost avoidance rather than a gain for you on those loans.... without those two you were headed for bottom half right now after a shcoking start you look to be a bit better and should take what 6th or 7th depending on lius suarez and coutinho for lfc stopping you. 11th to 7th sould still justify lukaku but nothing on the planet will justify barry's wages.
]So that's what your judging your transfer activity on is it?[/B]
I didn't say Lakaku was a bad signing, I think it is a great bit of business. I just said that £3m for a loan is a little high. Can't see you gaining three league places because of his signing mind (your comment suggests this but it probably wasn't what you meant).
What did you think to Felliani's performance yesterday?
I think moyes would have to do a lot worse before united would cut him out.
I'm sure united have the patience to stick with Moyes through this early teething.
He's a good manager... nowhere near as good as Fergie... but good nonetheless. He may drop out top 4 this year... but he'll be back next year.