You're getting way too big for your boots. Deleting posts on the basis of your own personal opinion as to what tedious or not......pathetic. Mind you, you have always been a massive fan of EGD Wright haven't you? So "shouting down" of any dissention or opposing point of view is in character.
It's not my agenda. Its the posters on here that have made comments about threads being ruined by nonsense like your first reply. As you missed it before, if I had the agenda you reckon, why would I keep a thread asking for positive articles on the name change free of dross like your reply? Why would I leave threads like this open for people to freely post their opinions without messing up another thread?
My point about the original post still stands. You cannot hide your bias. You call my response to the op as dross, but make no mention of the fact that the op itself was dross. Now that's the irony!
What bias? Nothing at all is hidden. Explain yourself. You want me to be unbiased but expect a comment on the quality or otherwise of the OP. How does that work?
I have explained myself. Go look back through the posts, I don't want to repeat myself as that would be too tedious. As for commenting on quality, you didn't seem to have much problem on commenting on my reply.
It was too tedious the first time, but it didn't explain the ridiculous position you've taken. I'm guessing by the failure to answer, you've realised you've ****ed up again.
I refer you to post #13 You were pissed off when your posts were deleted. Now you defend his right to delete them.
OK if you want to bang on about it, I'll indulge your little denial game. The original post is tedious. It says nothing new, nothing that's not been said a hundred times before and I made that point by posting an image of a yawn. Now that is a straight conversation between me and EGD Wright (your mate) as to whether his post was boring, he thought it wasn't, I thought it was. You come wading in and take away my reply to him because you side with his point of view. Tell you what. I know for a fact that I can go onto NewsNow and find 50 links to internet articles about the namechange. I bet if I were to start a new post with a link to them on here, you would delete them or merge them. (Oh and by the way, by deleting the posts you have created exactly the situation you claim you trying to protect everyone from in the first place, nice modding)
I wasn't P****d of at all but was asking a question. The deletion could have been my error.My primary concern was about the use of pretty poor language that some posters have to resort to.
I've answered that earlier, however, I'll indulge you. You seem to feel that if you decide a post is boring, you can disrupt the thread. I prefer people to have the opportunity to have their say, as do the others who have commented that they are put off this board by meaningless dross as your reply clearly is. I'm not sure how you can even consider it anything else. As for creating the situation I was trying to avoid, the thread asking for support for Mr Allam is running, (apart from another turd dropping from you) unmolested. Those that wanted to have an alternative discussion are free to do so on here. No posts are deleted. I started to prepare to merge the on topic posts as you seemed to want, but got diverted by answering your questions. Had I not been interupted, the thread you reckon I'm defending could have just been merged with the others.
I can't see that one, is it near the one I was in the throws of sorting until the usual suspects shot their mouths off prematurely and made it not worth the effort?
How was replying to the op disrupting the thread exactly??? "win win" LOL!! You'll be telling me your Dad's bigger than mine next. Grow up and stop deleting posts.
I could be forgiven for thinking that now the no campaign's gained support, the usual suspects need something else to be contrary about.
