They are actually just a bunch of infantile accounting errors; LUST got an expert to look over the books and he found like five clerical ****-ups. None of them look too sinister, but obviously it throws a spanner in the due diligence works when there's errors left, right and centre.
Fair enough YWBK, but I don't thnk they are stooping to that level ristac - I used the word "sly" to respond because that is the word used against LUST by YWBK and then quoted by you in your agreement. I also reiterate that quoting an account as written by a third party to indicate you have problems with them is also wrong. Regarding the player's information, the LUST chairman took that question squarely and answered it honestly, and it was a good answer that dealt with the issues, and they took a hard decision. They also stated that they would take the same decision again. You can disagree wit hthe decision, but they can justify it and justify it well, despite the split between members on whether that decision was the right thing to do. I disagree that your quotes of "opinions" was representative of the whole of the meeting, and it is just twisting things to suit your own argument. The quotes you bring out are taken out of context and requires people to listen to the whole thing, not pick out soundbites
Elmo you are clearly in total respect for LUST and can see no wrong in what they do or the approach that they use, I respect your opinion along with others who feel the same way. The decision on if releasing the players statement was a right or wrong thing to do; I accept that there will be divided opinion. I can't understand those that believe it was right as much as they probably fail to understand why I see it as wrong so I will leave it at that. I don't believe I have taken anything out of context, you choose to read it that way because you want to disagree with me and feel a need to back-up why. LUST clearly state that they have had no contact with the board, that is is personal opinion and that they drew on research from volunteers to echo our own conclusions. There were no facts, there was nothing new that anyone didn't already suspect. They can't answer the question we all want to know so please stop ass licking up to them and accusing others of twisting things.
