As is picking up grammatical errors. Another way of deflecting attention from your pointless argument. The police charged Gerrard as they charged Terry. They never charged Suarez so it was dealt with by the FA. As for "defending my own", I will tell you that if Terry is found to have racially abused Ferdinand then he deserves all he gets. I merely pointed out that Liverpool have players who are no angels themselves.
I merely pointed out the grammatical error as a response to your attempt to patronize me- let's not get into a tit-for-tat over this. You say you won't defend JT if he's found guilty in court, yet you seem determined to defend him over his assault on Sanchez, which we all saw, and doesn't need a court to judge it. Pointing out that some Liverpool players are not angels is stating the obvious and does not in any way pertain to a discussion about John Terry.
When have I defended Terry over his foul on Sanchez? He was an idiot for doing it and got what he deserved. I'm just pointing out the double standards of your statements. People in glass houses?
Where have I displayed double standards? I tried to have a reasonable debate with you over this. I haven't reflexively defended LFC players, merely pointed out that they are irrelevant to the thread. I'm not in a glass house, because I'm not personally responsible for the behaviour of others and am only giving an opinion. I've already expressed surprise that Gerrard was let off, my opinion is that he was guilty, but that there was provocation also. I firmly believe that Suarez was stitched up in order to be made an example of, and this has nothing to to with my opinion of him as a man or a player. It's because I've read the report and it's a shambles. I'm not interested in having an argument for its own sake so I'll leave you to it- there are plenty who will. I might come back to it if it moves on, but I have no interest in just repeating the same stuff with slightly different wording all the time.
