You see, this is exactly the point I was making earlier. While Spurlock may be cutting and even quite coarse with some of his remarks, he doesnt resort to racism. Why can't you give it back to him without the bigoted attacks? You really can't see it can you? That's all you seem to resort to. You have a problem mate. Anyway I've been asked by Burnham to leave it there. And I apologise to him for unintentionally opening up a can of worms.
I know...I share my cell with Rowan Atkinson. anyway....I don't dodge any question. I just don't dance to your beat.
Billy was banned justifiably, he was goaded into a corner where he could only lash out with what he had in his kit, try that with me cock breath ill run you ragged
sorry to hear you were in jail, on what offence, theft ,larceny, rape, terrorism,burglary,twoc,fraud, what was it im interested
@Spurlock btw fella. I'm out of order. I should have thanked you long before now for having my back on that thread when Billy attacked me, more than anybody on here did, I'm sorry you had to put up with the evil comments fired at you as a result. Cheers fella.
What's that got do with you putting out completely false versions of events? Maybe he is a liar. There worse things and it's irrelevant to the your lies which I'm disputing.
He wasn't goaded into a corner mate he was on the offensive as soon as the two 'guests' were saying negative things about Comm. Billy's got no filter when he's involved in confrontations on here, then afterwards he goes the opposite way and becomes passive as if he wasn't the aggressor. He fully deserved his ban regardless of what the guests were saying and defending him, with nothing but blind loyalty is pointless in this case. I know he's your mucker mate but he did this all himself. There's a lot more to him than being an aggy gobshite though, which is why I don't just judge him based on moments like this, although that doesn't mean I condone it.
