Ok, in light of a few WUMs popping up on our board recently, I think the moderator subject is due a review.
What are people's thoughts on getting one?
What are people's thoughts on getting one?
Best just to ignore them, if you can.
The only other thing I'd say to the main Moderators is to put an icon like a red card
in the Achievements column just to show others this person is a WUM and has a history
of posting cr*p and has been reported by other forums.
The trouble with that is that it would be open to abuse. I think that's why the whole rep thing was abandoned - if, say, a well meaning and reasonable Liverpool fan (I think there are one or two of them) posted on the Man Utd board, he could get red-carded by unreasonable Utd fans (again, let's just assume that some of them exist) and there would be no way of showing that he wasn't a WUM. I agree with those who say let's just ignore annoying WUMs. I'm reluctant to use the actual 'ignore' function of the website, but if we get repeat offenders, we could just all put them on our ignore list and then we wouldn't even see their posts.
The only thing that having a Mod would give us is someone to approach other mods about WUMs, but there's no reason that one of us couldn't do that anyway, just by sending a personal message. I'm quite proud of the fact that we're one of most active boards (possibly the most active) that doesn't have a mod. I don't think we need one, and that fact is a testimony to the intelligent and good-natured banter that we have here. Well done us!
You guys are pretty lucky to have the board run 'normally' without a moderator in place, wish ours could be the same but with a fierce rivalry with the Suffolk contingent it is not possible.
You have two very close rivals in Chelsea and QPR, how come you don't normally get grief from these guys unless a match between the two of you is on the horizon? Do they not consider Fulham to be rivals?
when was his last post? A while ago now. He led the line for us on the old 606 forum
If a mod can't ban or remove posts, I don't see what difference it would make - if WUMs turn up then we're powerless to do anything apart from ignore them or ask them nicely to go away, mod or no.
I like the idea of being a super moderator. PICK ME PICK ME PICK ME

I am sure Syd (the super mod) will stand down at some point, he was very close to doing so after the Gary Speed suicide and several bad taste threads that appeared on general chat.
A mod can close threads posted on that board, the problem comes in where, say for example I created a thread on the Norwich board and added Fulham to that thread. The Fulham mod could only request the removal via the Norwich mod(s).
So if I came on to your board only, and posted something, your mod (if he/she existed) could close it. Beyond that there is a site super mod who can close any thread, remove them and hand out bans if warranted but you would might need a moderator to action this with the super mod.
The cross board moderation has been an issue since cross board threads were created. One day, hopefully moderators will be able to close from either side if required.