Rosberg thinks Michael should stay. http://www.google.com/hostednews/uk...-HwLko9B37PHU9qVA?docId=N0266371348058904020A
Is that showing he might be a bit worried if Hamilton went to Mercedes? Surely he's trying to convince Schumacher to stay so Hamilton can't join?
Were it not for the stupid team strategies, mechanical issues and so on, Michael would have been well into the top 10 of the standings. I take heart in knowing that Michael did **** Rosberg over this year, and will remember it when others forget.
really? from what I can see Rosberg has almost double Schumachers points, not my defintion of ****ing all over someone, especially as we all know the car is designed for Schumacher more than Rosberg.
So you are the new Gary Anderson with the inside knowledge? If you read my post and take notice of the fact that I mentioned that he had more mechanical faults, which weren't his fault, then you can see what I mean. Simply looking at points is silly, and makes out that you probably haven't even watched most of the races and seen what happened.
only one of us doesn't live in reality E. MSC's best results have come because the 5 or 6 cars ahead of him retired, adelaide was MSC crashing not gearbox, you can believe your own fantasy, but don't try and ram it down everyone elses throats on a daily basis, it's tedious. I also remember Brawn changing the Chassis in '10 to help out Schumacher to the detriment of Rosberg, and I've yet to see Mercedes make a decsion that favours of Rosberg over Schumacher, but more than a few the other way around.
An interesting, and very easy conclusion to arrive at, Fred! A very easy agreement to arrive at, Bando! Well, you may have a point about "simply looking at pointsâ¦" EMSC, although I disagree with the conclusion that Miggins may not have been watching most of the races. However, any lucky coin very much has two sides; and on the face of it, surely you see this looks like a preference for one side only? Please consider the following: If your statement is relevant, doesn't it also form the basis of any conclusion based upon points? Or is it that you think such factors should only apply when suiting the basis of one's argument? Surely this is particularly relevant when one bears in mind how all World Drivers' Championships are decided? On the other hand, one might conclude that other factors are indeed relevant all of the time, since being selective about such things necessarily invalidates any and all logic based on statistics.
Don't ram it down our throats that you don't like Schumacher, because it is obvious. I was simply letting you know that glimpsing at the standings and making a conclusion doesn't always tell the whole story. Where do you get these ideas that Michael is favoured over Rosberg please... We all get the same coverage of news and headlines/rumours, **** knows where you get these theories from.
I get my information from the same place you do, it's just my brain doesn't edit out anything to the detriment of Schumacher.
You do it to vilify him. Which when you don't even have a good word to say, sums up why I should keep you on my ignore list, goodnight.
The plot thickens... Am I just thinking wishfully or are Mercedes up to something? Would Lewis really sign for such a badly performing team if they weren't planning/promising something big?