Off Topic Meghan Mauls Mail !

Scumbag press.
Discuss: In a non political manner of course. US approach comes to Britain ?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56028583

 

Decent paper - don't like it? don't read it

Thanks.

 

Don't read it. Judgement rules. Don't like it, don't accept it.
Scumbag press.

 

Do you get it delivered through your door or summat?

 

Do you agree/disgree with the judgement? That'd be more useful.

 

A paper I buy now and again, it's far away from my political views but at least it has actual news in it. As for the royals, send 'em to Yekaterinburg!

 

Surely the bad guy is her father who sold the personal letters & not the newspaper??

 

.

How about the corporate entities who pay the newspaper for advertising space/publicity opportunities, and the public who buy the newspapers to feed their lust for sensationalism?

 

You didn’t answer the question .....surely the father who sold the letters is at primary fault

 

You didn't understand my implication in the response I made.
The father "sold" his story, or was "solicited" by the newspaper for financial reward to provide "private" family information. Where lies the responsibility for protecting private family information?

I'd say follow the money source.

So far in the case, the courts seem to be taking the same position.

Scumbag press.

 

The press didn't hold a gun to her Fathers head,he voluntarily offered the letter for remuneration.Yes,the press printed it but ultimately the Father must take responsibility?

The Courts suck!!

 

There is something duplicitous about this.
A celebrity, someone who uses the media for financial gain, sues for privacy. It’s a joke.

She took it to court in my view simply because to stopped a future source of income.

My view of Megan is that I admire her industry and progressive campaigning. I don’t like her as an actress. But she is a successful and determined woman.

She is also dollar driven and I do not believe that she was ever going to be a good fit into the Royal family. Harry is lucky to have such a wife but unlucky to have a wife who never could be a member of the royal family.

The scumbag press... Nah scumbag Father

 

A set of attention seeking ****s that serve no real purpose squabbling and making the legal ****s richer.

She was a non-entity before, and getting married just made her a better known non-entity. It didn't suddenly make her an expert on anything, so who the **** would really care what she thinks or has done?

 

You are wrong about her being a non entity before meeting Harry. She was successful in her own right in the states both as an actress and campaigner. Financially she had more money than Harry.
Royalty just was a pot of gold for her. But although I don’t like her, I have to admit that she is no fool.

 

I've been wrong before, not that it always changes my mind like.

 

For a second time - you haven’t answered the question......

 

That made me lol

I read the mail, well some of it, Martin Samuel and Hitchens are good value. And I see all the headlines so I’m aware of the kardashians etc without ever watching the show or reading the articles.
But they way the mail has gone for her is disgusting, every single day article after article about different aspects of her life. All from a “source” or “friends” or the place **** stirrers itself.
And don’t give me this bollocks it comes with the territory. We’ve seen with Caroline flack etc etc what that does. And yes they often court publicity but aren’t aware or don’t think the backlash is coming

 

It was estimated she had around $5 million before she met Harry. I think Harry had considerably more than that.
A successful actress? She had carried a suitcase and starred in a TV series watched by 2 million, a paltry figure in the States. She was no higher than actresses in Emmerdale and Coronation Street.
I don't recall her being invited to fly on the private jets of stars and borrow their luxurious mansions before she met Harry.
She is a money obsessed gold digger who wants to use the media when it suits her but have privacy the rest of the time. You can't have it both ways.
As for being a campaigner, spare me the lectures about the state of the world and reducing our carbon emissions and thinking twice about a once a year flight to Spain from someone living in a house with 16 bathrooms who drives around in gas guzzling limos and uses private planes as frequently as we use taxis.

 

For the third time, you can't read between the lines.
The father is a mere gullible pawn in the game. Probably the one to blame the least.
Hope that helps.

 

Bullshit - the father offered the letters for sale to the highest bidder. No one forced him, he wasn’t a gullible pawn.

He was motivated by pure greed & sold his daughter away - the press / media are largely blameless in this