Hope the twat is out of a job. An absolute disgrace. Matic's red card was deserved but f**king hell!!!!!
you must be blind. DId you see how Matic's leg bent?
If he is soft![]()
You have just posted your football ignorance to the world. This is as dumb, ignorant, and biased as Martin Atkinson.Nothing wrong with the tackle imo. Matic went in as barnes was passing the ball away and his leg merely scraped barnes' boot. Tell matic to stop being a soft ****![]()
One day you might come on showing common sense and judgement, but today isn't it again.Why's he a disgrace if it was deserved?
You missed the kick in the back on Brana, and the two penalty shouts even the biased plonkers at Sky called. You're as bad a judge as the referee you are defending.Missing the horror tackle on Matic was a bad mistake but no great surprise. Atkinson's incompetence has helped Chelsea out in the past. Yesterday it went against you for once.
i will admit i was too quick to post that. after second viewing, it appears that matic divedYou have just posted your football ignorance to the world. This is as dumb, ignorant, and biased as Martin Atkinson.

You missed the kick in the back on Brana, and the two penalty shouts even the biased plonkers at Sky called. You're as bad a judge as the referee you are defending.
than Atkinsoncan some one ban this useless tool of this board?i will admit i was too quick to post that. after second viewing, it appears that matic dived![]()
can some one ban this useless tool of this board?
This is beyond ridiculous - trying to be funny eh?
whatever you do, dont start being racist please
Neither paranoid nor offended, it takes a lot more than comments like that to cause offence. Simply stating the obvious, that Atkinson is an incompetent , biased and arrogant referee who gave the worst refereeing performance of this and many other seasons. A performance that certainly cost us 2 points, our best player for 3 games, and could be the difference at seasons end. If you can't see that, there's not a lot of credibility for you on this site.So calling the decision a mistake, that it was a horror tackle, that the ref is a repeat offender, and (in another thread) saying the Burnley player was out of order and that Matic was harshly done by is classified as "defending" the ref? Or have you simply taken offence to the suggestion that Atkinson has given a dodgy decision in Chelsea's favour in the past? Comes across as more than a bit paranoid.
You're not making any sense. I said it was a shocking tackle, a terrible decision and that Matic has been harshly treated. Yet you think I've defended the ref. OK!Neither paranoid nor offended, it takes a lot more than comments like that to cause offence. Simply stating the obvious, that Atkinson is an incompetent , biased and arrogant referee who gave the worst refereeing performance of this and many other seasons. A performance that certainly cost us 2 points, our best player for 3 games, and could be the difference at seasons end. If you can't see that, there's not a lot of credibility for you on this site.
Don't accuse a referee of bias. That's ludicrous. By all means say he's incompetent, ****, shouldn't be refereeing in the PL etc but to call a referee biased just because they had a **** day is petty. Not to mention completely unfounded. Are you Mourinho in disguise?Perhaps Atkinson would have given one off 50-50 decision to us in the past.
Missing 2 Red card tackles, 2 Penalties and sending off our player. That is crooked, incompetent and biased.
My comments are restricted to your statement that Atkinson has "helped" us in the past. He has never helped anyone except Utd in his whole career, except by making blunders. My complaint about Atkinson covers a series of blunders in this game, not one tackle. At least we can agree he totally bottled / stuffed up the Matic incident, and the punishment for our team is way OTT for the crime.You're not making any sense. I said it was a shocking tackle, a terrible decision and that Matic has been harshly treated. Yet you think I've defended the ref. OK!