Have you considered that it might just be a piss take on "the HIAGster" ... the sentiment applies mind
Am I attempting to stick up for hiag though? No Just calling Skiddy a **** for being a ****... Unlike you that is so blinded by your dislike of hiag that you ignore everything by Skiddy cos he doesn't like him either...
Fosse doesn't do allegiances...it's what he blames everyone else of doing. Fosse hasn't got his nose firmly wedged between Chavvy butt cheeks....it's the rest of us that take sides. Fosse has got a mind of his own...it's a shame it's planted firmly up Chav/Goon ring pieces. You know why that is? Hiag and Spurs. So please stop accusing Fossey for taking sides please log in to view this image
... firstly ...wasn't inferring that you were sticking up for HIAG ... just pointing out that where Skiddy is concerned, HIAG's protestations of ignoring him are just as much bollox ... ... secondly, I don't tend to get involved in personal spats between other posters, particularly when it goes beyond anything related to football and gets very personal and without humour... why should I? ... I don't mod this board, nor would I want to ... in contrast, I would get involved on the LCFC board if it got like that as that comes with being a mod for it ... ... thirdly, whilst personally I do think HIAG is a tedious twat and not really someone I'd ever want to go for a beer with ... that's not really got much to do with dislike ... I find him quite boring and his attempts at humour rather predictable and lacking in any real originality or invention ... but that's just me... and plenty may feel exactly the same about me.... but the main reason I have little time or respect for him is due to his bet welching ... might not mean much to him but for me 'honour amongst thieves' has always been sacrosanct and none of my mates, that I can think of, would do that ... ... finally ... I am happy to receive it ... because I give it out ... no bleating, no complaints, no imagined conspiracies and no requests for bans ...
... very good... but ignores one very important thing ... your buddy has created threads about both my team and me personally ... the majority of posts that I have made that involve him are responses to one or the other .. his invention of the 'Pded' is just a comfort blanket for his insecurity ... I have no allegiance to either Chelsea or Arsenal, never had, never will ... indeed, as is the case with most Leicester fans, we'd rather a Spurs title triumph on the whole - we like an underdog in Leicester. However, the antics of Quentin have lessened that preference, I suspect (on not606) ... that you think he is witty and blindly like every post he makes is your prerogative ... but I'm pretty sure you wouldn't be doing it if he supported anyone other than Spurs. That you accuse anyone else of taking sides is rather funny in the circumstances. You seem to have been fooled by his 'conspiracy' theory... fair enough ... the reality is that anyone not prepared to put up with his nonsense will end up getting a thread made about them at some point (probably with a poll)... it helps to deflect from the fact that he really can't take what he likes to dish out and is a very poor loser, one whose bitterness shows little sign of abating ... "trust me"
I take sides...course I do...there's no denying that. I just don't try to wrap it up with some warped logic. Everyone takes sides against the Gingershister the only reason you don't is because of Hiag. You said you had no time for Hiag because of him 'welching' a bet....and now you use that to have a pop at Hiag at every given opportunity....don't deny it Fossy lad. Plus the whole he had a dig at your team so you had a dig at his....I get that....earlier you got involved with Hiag's spat created by Aki and his misinformation. That had nowt to do with you.
... of course I use the bet welching ... embarrassingly unforgiveable in any bloke IMO ... surprised you haven't condemned that tbh ... and who does AKCJ support Spurlock? .... and finally .. what has Skiddy ever done to me that I should take sides against him? ... you accuse me of being blinkered because I don't, whilst blindly endorsing everything that Quentin does? ... do you not get the irony?
