What a nice person you are. How about you **** off and do us all a favour. And when you have ****ed off perhaps you could keep away until you have something sensible to say - maybe post-puberty?
I do love being threatened by little ****es from their parents basements, it's cute. Oh, you're losing AGAIN. Choke choke.
And you think we're not? Do you think we like playing some of the best football we've played in about 15 years picking up excellent results in big derbies and then reading about controversies off the pitch instead. The simple fact is the middle/upper class are ruining the game with their PC nonsense. Football isn't about football anymore it's about politics. United win controversially 3-2 on Sunday and all the talk is about Mikel/Clattenburg. QPR hold Chelsea to a draw and all the talk is about a nonsense handshake. Spurs set to play Chelsea in a massive game and all the talk is about John Terry (who inelligible to play anyway), AVB and Abramovich. It's comical but at the same time sad.
The spanish bit has already been withdrawn. I think Chelsea are going to suffer massively over this if nothing can be proved. Fed up with footballers thinking they can do as they please. If a player continually confronts the ref in an aggressive manner he should be carded, sent off and eventually banned. The FA need to show some guts and start disciplining players for their poor behaviour: the clubs won't.
Theyve withdrawn that allegation, ie it did not happen and they are going along with the monkey one which the other officials said did not happen. So it looks like they are making this one up too. It wouldnt be the 1st time. Terry was fined years ago for making up false allegations against a ref.
Actually we dropped that one due to insufficient evidence, just like the CPS should have dropped the case against John Terry for there being insufficient evidence. We waited a whole three days before lodging a complaint to make sure that we had good justification for doing so. In that period Chelsea conducted further investigations (interviewing several players and staff) and sought out outside legal advice. It's not something which we done in the heat of the moment, it involved a timely and rational thought process. Anyway that was Terry who made that allegation about Graham Poll, this is Chelsea Football Club. Terry's claim wasn't actually proven false he was just advised to drop it as he again had insufficient evidence for what had been said. That's just more reason though for why we wouldn't just make a complaint if we didn't have a leg to stand on.
How ironic Once Mikel is proven as a liar, I really hope you get serious punishment. You have racist players, racist fans and the cheek to accuse a REFEREE of all people, of being a racist, simply because a game didn't go your way. I also find it very bizarre that there are no threads discussing all these racist issues on this forum. As far as I'm concerned not talking about is equivalent to condoning it. Now let's see how long it takes for this post to get deleted.
This is so depressing. How did that moron abuse welbeck with monkey noises when Ramirez was nearby playing for Chelsea ? Does he not realise that he is not only offending Welbeck but all the black players on the pitch and Black spectators including Chelsea's in that stadium? It must be more important fr some to abuse their opponents than to avoid upsetting their own players Chelsea will have to be very careful not be dragged down further by racism issues
I don't have any evidence but ask anyone with any common sense, whether to believe a disgruntled player who just lost a match because of a few controversies or a long time serving Premier league referee with no previous accusations against him, who on top of all that had a mic stuck to his face and 99% of people will follow my opinion. Only biased fans will defend Mikel. I'm guessing those fans will claim the F.A is corrupted once clattenburg is cleared. Either way, for a club who acted awfully righteous about the JT row and the Clattenberg, this is taking the piss. Maybe you should clear up the mess in your own front yard before pointing fingers.
I'm sure Chelsea will take care of him but the most absurd and ridiculous thing about this, is that this idiot acted like that during last night's game! not the first game which would have been coincidental. He actually did it despite most likely reading or hearing (not sure this twat can actually read) tons and tons of articles for 3 days straight about the mikel/clattenberg row.
Precisely, so stop taking the moral ****ing high ground! I'm not defending anyone, but since you're rattling on about common sense why not take another rational view point and look at the possibility of this being a complete misunderstanding? Mikel probably heard wrong, the club are hardly going to brush it off considering the wringing JT got so decided to pursue it and protect one of our players. Nothing wrong with that whatsoever. There is also nothing to stop mindless idiots, like the one photographed, entering the ground. All we can do as a club is stop him/them from entering again. You'd think the entire ****ing ground was chanting with hoods up the way you tree huggers go on, he's a twat - every club has them.
OF COURSE it's likely to be a misunderstanding... the player's name and the word Monkey could easily have sounded the same in a packed stadium and especially with a geordie accent. But if this is the "obvious" option then why the immediate defence from the club? to actually get the police to probe is quite serious. There are resources involved, expensive costs... why would CHelsea go public with all that, blatantly defending their player 100% if they actually believe it is likely to be a misunderstanding. I mean for it to have gone this far, then Mikel must have felt seriously offended right? and the club is backing their player (fair enough). If the FA review the ref's mic recordings and find nothing close to "monkey" then what? should Mikel just say "oh sorry for creating massive media uproar, accusing an innocent man of being racist, getting the police involved and using their resources... my bad!" These are serious accusations... it's like taking someone to court.. if you do so and are proven wrong... you pick up the bill and the ramifications. I don't see how this can be solved without either CLattenberg getting sacked for life of league football or Chelsea picking up some kind of penalty for creating this mess and escalating it to where it is at now.
tbh I don't think Mikel and Monkey sound anything alike, even with a geordie accent! Ramires and Luiz both backed Mikel so that's 3 players, if the club is seen to be ignoring 3 players claiming they heard racist remarks then I as a fan ain't gonna be too happy let alone the players! I believe we have dropped the claim anyway, as there isn't sufficient evidence. To vilify anyone in this situation is ridiculous imo, but I'm with you - there's no chance a ref would say it
Clattenberg might have been trying to say Mikel - but it just came out all wrong ! - after all he did get a lot of other things wrong on the night [video=youtube;Y9YViHbaAWM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=Y9YViHbaAWM[/video] EDIT can I just say that NO racial offence is intended by this post. I have always found Peter Sellers to be funny - and it is a co-incidence the way in which he pronounces the word 'monkey' sounds something different. Who knows what Clattenberg said / meant etc - you could have almost have forgiven him if he had got the footballing decisions right.
The day the FA backs us in any major dispute the temperature in Hell will read minus 40; the short term satisfaction of watching the authorities and Clottenberk brick themselves will dwell into insignificance compared with the tidal wave of retribution coming our way when this turns to custard. The thing that astounds me is the ease with which we seem to move from one F**K up to another! Out of all the comments from other managers - Wenger's seems to the more considered response maybe its high time we review our protocols so that we can take a step back instead of jumping in with all the subtlety of a "two-footed" tackle.
