1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Man City, United and Chelsea set for Barkley bidding war........

Discussion in 'Manchester City' started by Father_Jack_Hackett, Sep 25, 2011.

  1. Drogs

    Drogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    17,870
    Likes Received:
    356
    Get tae **** <ok>
     
    #41
  2. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    And yet you are stuck with Mikel <laugh>
     
    #42
  3. Unbiased Opinion

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2011
    Messages:
    558
    Likes Received:
    1
    Wouldnt get a look in at city, chelsea have mccherean and need an experienced cam to replace lampard ( modric ), however i could see him going to united, but 20m tops.
     
    #43
  4. The Ginger Marks

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    40,611
    Likes Received:
    16,228
    I'd rather have Mikel anyday than that second rate numbnuts who Spurs couldn't wait to get shot of. <ok>
     
    #44
  5. tevezrightboot

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    1
    To big arisk to pay that amount of money for a player who has yet to prove that he can play in the premiership. However this is still his first season in the prem so a fee of £10 million tops with add ons is nearer the mark. I am sure any of the big clubs can get better players for less from the continent then what they can from this country at the moment.
     
    #45
  6. bluemoon2

    bluemoon2 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Messages:
    4,677
    Likes Received:
    105
    Not worth £10m let alone £30m.With the Bison likely to be back Jan/Feb our midfield choices of Essien, Romeu, Ramirez, Lampard, Mikel, Meireles and McEachran has got to be as classy as anything in the land as it is!
     
    #46

Share This Page