Makienok - worse than Leaburn

The title of this thread is is Makienok worse than Leaburn that is a no brainer and not because Makienok is so bad it's because I thought Carl was ok.
UnMercifully slaughtered but a half decent target man set up loads of goals for other people I'd have in in our team now like a shot.
Big Mak is crap tho

 

They're both s**t. Just different types of s**t...:

Leaburn... was like Horse ****. Useful in certain situations. Like when you want to enrich you flower beds. Still **** though and stinks the place out.

Makienok... Fox ****... nobody likes Fox ****, it's absolutely no use to anyone, properly stinks the place out and it's f*****g infuriating when you tread in it.

 

I used to work with Carl's brother Pat. Great bloke, bigger than Carl.

 

Leaburn has put on a 'bit' of weight since he packed up now.

 

Gobsmacked by all the posters on CL feeling that Mak was hard done by and feeling sorry for him.
At least 3/4 of the games he played he was so ineffectual and such a lack of effort, i thought it was disgraceful.

 

True still put him our side now tho he'd be our best striker

 

It's his lack of effort that is the thing disgusting to have so little heart and bottle on a football pitch.
Inexcusable in a player on a Sunday morning in a pub league let alone a professional football earning £££££

 

I couldn't believe how poor he was in the air. He also couldn't trap a bag of cement. Who does Preston's scouting?

 

Think they do it by video

 

By men in Belgium?

 

Reams.

 

No by those that make special videos for Sky between channels 800 and 900

 

Agreed. Curbs kept picking Big Carl for a reason. There's no way he'd ever have picked Big Mak.