Mafia 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Voting Table: (Order vertically is from first person voted to most recent person voted for, Order of votes by is first cast listed first, second listed second etc)
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]Nominee[/td]
[td]Votes[/td]
[td]Vote(s) By[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gerrez[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]AfcFtw, valley, bodanki[/td]
[/tr]

[tr]
[td]BRB[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]gerrez, lucaaas, danilo[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]IBWT[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]billy, mito, BRB[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]sky[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]IBWT[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]afcftw[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]swarbs, mummy, nozzer [/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]bodanki[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]RHC[/td]
[/tr]




[/table]

not voted listed alphabetically: Skylarker

Table of people with no votes: (listed alphabetically)
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]Nominee[/td]
[td]Votes[/td]
[td]Vote(s) By[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Billy[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Danilo[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Lucaaas[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]mito[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]
mummy's milk[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Nozzer[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]RHC[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Swarbs[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Valleygraduate12[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]No lynch[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
 
Mummy:7282657 said:
I asked some time ago what people wanted me to do.

<laugh> I was only commenting on the fact that you've gone from most votes to out of the coinflip again (although you might be heading to it again).

I've said all along I'm happy to be in a coin flip but guys people won't believe after past conquests :)
 
And I'm back in the firing line lol

Something I've noticed is we've ended up wi the same early candidates being the ones up top near the end of the day. Can't help thinking some quiet people are getting an easy ride.

I'm happy with a coin flip as it's got people in it I'm suspicious of but I think we should get a random who has avoided any suspicion so far in on the action. Bit of a curve ball for the mafia to deal with as they will have been planning a strategy based round those currently in the toss as most where early front runners.
 
right ok... done... ok... i have no idea how we got here which leads me to suspect the mafia have enjoyed this confusion too much.

i now have fished enough.... i am confused and tabled out so i hope you are all happy. i have now no idea who is who
 
We all know that AFC and Gerrez will survive the coin flip... they always do! <laugh> You two don't have anything to fear... you always slip out of danger... you're coated in Teflon!
 
EDIT: Like Milk, I don't find afcftw particularly suspicious; I'd rather have Valley in there. Just to get the tie going.

Same. I feel we are just jumping on someone who made a suggestion here. It could work and lead us to a mafia but people who have been the most suspicious this round like IBWT, Gerrez & brb are all up but Valley (the other suspicious player) isn't.
 
And I'm back in the firing line lol

Something I've noticed is we've ended up wi the same early candidates being the ones up top near the end of the day. Can't help thinking some quiet people are getting an easy ride.

I'm happy with a coin flip as it's got people in it I'm suspicious of but I think we should get a random who has avoided any suspicion so far in on the action. Bit of a curve ball for the mafia to deal with as they will have been planning a strategy based round those currently in the toss as most where early front runners.

On the other hand, we now have a situation with four names up for a tie and Sky (hopefully) safe-ish. Any changes now are probably going to look a bit suspect.
 
moreinjuredthanowen:7282663 said:
Voting Table: (Order vertically is from first person voted to most recent person voted for, Order of votes by is first cast listed first, second listed second etc)
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]Nominee[/td]
[td]Votes[/td]
[td]Vote(s) By[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Gerrez[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]AfcFtw, valley, bodanki[/td]
[/tr]

[tr]
[td]BRB[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]gerrez, lucaaas, danilo[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]IBWT[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]billy, mito, BRB[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]sky[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]IBWT[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]afcftw[/td]
[td]3[/td]
[td]swarbs, mummy, nozzer [/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]bodanki[/td]
[td]1[/td]
[td]RHC[/td]
[/tr]




[/table]

not voted listed alphabetically: Skylarker

Table of people with no votes: (listed alphabetically)
[table="width: 500, class: grid, align: left"]
[tr]
[td]Nominee[/td]
[td]Votes[/td]
[td]Vote(s) By[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Billy[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Danilo[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Lucaaas[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]mito[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]
mummy's milk[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Nozzer[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]RHC[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Swarbs[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Valleygraduate12[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]No lynch[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[td]0[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]

All well and good but it won't end this way. I'm not going to change (you should trust me on this by now too) but I know BRB will switch to me.

Happy to be in a for way if it status this way.
 
afcftw:7282667 said:
And I'm back in the firing line lol

Something I've noticed is we've ended up wi the same early candidates being the ones up top near the end of the day. Can't help thinking some quiet people are getting an easy ride.

I'm happy with a coin flip as it's got people in it I'm suspicious of but I think we should get a random who has avoided any suspicion so far in on the action. Bit of a curve ball for the mafia to deal with as they will have been planning a strategy based round those currently in the toss as most where early front runners.

Didn't you accuse me of trying to change the votes earlier <whistle>
 
Same. I feel we are just jumping on someone who made a suggestion here. It could work and lead us to a mafia but people who have been the most suspicious this round like IBWT, Gerrez & brb are all up but Valley (the other suspicious player) isn't.

Unless Swarbs comes on, there's no reason for us to move though as it won't get the necessary votes. I'd be more than happy for me, Milk and Swarbs to all switch though.
 
Im happy to go with a coinflip, but puzzled as to why AFC has been included, not that I have any proof one way or another of his innocence, its just that Valley has pulled arguably the dodgiest move in the game so far, or atleast as dodgy as IBWT, so why is he being left out?
 
Mummy:7282679 said:
We all know that AFC and Gerrez will survive the coin flip... they always do! <laugh> You two don't have anything to fear... you always slip out of danger... you're coated in Teflon!

I died in the coin flip in Mafia 1
 
Unless Swarbs comes on, there's no reason for us to move though as it won't get the necessary votes. I'd be more than happy for me, Milk and Swarbs to all switch though.

Or, me and Milk could switch to Bodanki, but I have no more reason to suspect him than afc at this stage.
 
Same. I feel we are just jumping on someone who made a suggestion here. It could work and lead us to a mafia but people who have been the most suspicious this round like IBWT, Gerrez & brb are all up but Valley (the other suspicious player) isn't.

I tend to agree... and Valley should be a leading candidate tomorrow. Right now though... we've got a 4 way tie (that may or may not include Mafia) - and any more juggling of votes might end up breaking the equilibrium. (and would look very suspicious at this point). Be nice if there were a way to bring Valley into the toss: perhaps if sky and RHC voted for him... and IBWT switched to him too! <whistle>
 
well a least i can rest my fingers. we are all watching now i guess.

in the end i feel somewhere buried in all this is a kernal of truth to be looked for but for now the two objectives i had going in were get a tie up and get the vote away from sky. i really have no read on any of the 4 at risk. brb's votes right after my fishing one is not understood yet
 
Nozzer:7282693 said:
Same. I feel we are just jumping on someone who made a suggestion here. It could work and lead us to a mafia but people who have been the most suspicious this round like IBWT, Gerrez & brb are all up but Valley (the other suspicious player) isn't.

Unless Swarbs comes on, there's no reason for us to move though as it won't get the necessary votes. I'd be more than happy for me, Milk and Swarbs to all switch though.

You expect it to sit still for an hour? <laugh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.