Not if they remember how I play the game, I'm playing the same this time round as will be revealed if I'm lynched. So I guess people have to trust me or not, but they would be a fool not to. How are we ******s by playing a different game to you? you promote random voting, I don't - simple as that really.
But if you are assigning votes to people at random then there seems to be no difference between voting for someone and flipping a coin. If we have one vote for all 12 people then there's a one in four chance we lynch a KGB man. If we choose one person to lynch at random then there is an equal chance we lynch a KGB man. If we choose any other number of people for a vote then the odds are still the same, as we are not certain of having a KGB man in the vote, but we are more likely to select one if we do. My problem with one vote for everyone is that we don't really learn anything - we're just hoping we hit a KGB man whilst the KGB can assassinate us and can recruit one of us (potentially the journalist or vigilante) if we hit one of them who isn't the recruiter. I'd rather vote based on a theory, which gives us the same random chance of hitting a KGB man even if it's wrong, and will actually teach us something. With that in mind, and with afc and Sky both voting for the same man and thus putting him ahead of afc in the running, I'll change my vote to afc and see what that shakes out.
So far we have myself and at least one other person claiming I'm innocent and others saying they would go with that theory. Yet I find myself on 3 votes. RHC and hash both voted for me within minutes of each other and then faded into the background. Hash gave no real reason despite it putting me into the lead on votes. Both of these guys voted gerrez yesterday and kept there votes there. Swarbs has now stepped in quickly to stop Astro being in harms way. Some possible links arising at the moment.
Swarbs did you watch us play the last game? If not - I showed my hand first as being innocent, and got some good info and we won. I'm playing the same this time (as you'll see if I'm lynched). If you're a townie then trust me on this afc is a wasted vote. If you don't listen, everyone knows how I play and you'll be suspected as being Mafia or KGB as I'm playing an honest round here. You have to believe me. If you do there could be something in it for you too. If you don't you'll be gone next as my info that afc is a townie will be proved if he's lynched.
From beyond the grave, The black eyed child of Bodankus judges that Astro should grow up and stop being a whiny little meatpole.....people want to play it differently to you....no need to throw a strop and start insulting everyone. You strike me as the kind of boy who used to take his ball and go home if you werent allowed to play as striker with your mates. please log in to view this image
See now things are livening up. **** all this random voting, it keeps the game stale. Patterns are certainly showing, and it's now down to those in the patterns to either split or get found out. Like I said earlier "Let's play mother ****ers"
yawwwnnn..... mito is in witness protection living in florida... faked his own death to escape from the mafia hit. nobody thought to move the pile of maths books. i'm having a right giggle at you lot.
I am. A special one. I only voted for afc because he voted for me. Just to prove it, I vote Hash instead
RHC trying to create some distance with hash after voting the same way twice? Care to elaborate on why hash? I am suspicious of him so I'm not complaining!
I've said it multiple times, you and hash voted the same way two rounds running without giving proper reasons and both times it's put someone into the lead for death!
Wise man. I have no incline on Hash, but Astro stinks of guilt. I'm surprised you didn't go for Astro to be honest?? Always time to change
