Off Topic Madeleine McCann
- Thread starter Albert's Chip Shop
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
I agree. I actually get angry when this kind of thing happens because I have kids. I honestly would love to be in a room with a ***** for two minutes where the police say what happens is off the record because I would kill him within seconds.
Drug dealers - destroy lives but the people choose.
Fraudsters - destroy lives but people live.
All other crimes generally speaking apart from murder I can accept as an act of choice.
But *****s are the lowest scum ok the planet and I wound happily break their necks!
If they had him 'bang to rights' they wouldn't have released this info calling him a suspect and asking for more information.
I'm not saying he didn't do it, and I suspect we'll never know for sure but they quite clearly don't have him bang to rights at this stage.
they are in early days of a massive investigation into this guy, but I think they'll get this guy for more than one eventually.. just fits the profile of serial killer perfectly and I said that before the news he was reported a sexual predator and today's revelation about another child.
time will tell, but I'm predicting this guy has more than one or two
I agree with this they require more evidence and it’s coming out. In one day they know
i agree.
Also the fact that the two disappearances albeit 8 years apart are almost on the same day kind of makes me think that the date is important to him.
Child killers are the worst scum. Serial killers a close second.
But how many other people were as well?
The jury might want to push the button but if the judge throws it out they don’t get the chance. Juries may be swayed on emotion but a judge isn’t.
What evidence? The fact he was in the same place each time ? No other evidence you said. What about all the others who were also in the same town? Evidence yes, overwhelming not a chance. You can rest your case but then you can watch the judge throw it out.
How is the fact that there has been a murder evidence that the accused and not someone else murdered the deceased?
You’ve demonstrated you have no knowledge of the law best to quit while you’re ahead. The free lessons are now ended.
The guys a straight up serial killer all day long.
I noticed the police saying they've no longer any hope of finding her alive yesterday too.... go figure
Can you please point Tony’s green doctor in the direction of the light my friend! He’s more deluded than a mackem!
Sorry, I didn’t realise reading wasn’t one of your strong points. I’ll bear that in mind in future.
You ask a question, you don’t like the answer so you throw childish insults. One last bit of free advice, grow up.
I do wonder if the people who have accused the Mccans of the murder are starting to consider they were way off. I mean it's so obvious this guy did it. lol. I assume the next stage is denial and then once they've proved it's him they'll say it's a conspiracy. It's so much easier to just say " hmmm yes I think I got that one wrong "
To be fair it seems extremely likely to me that he was involved in some way or another. I don't dispute that. I just said they don't have him bang to rights otherwise they would have announced an arrest rather than a suspect.
I'd also hazard a guess, and this is only my opinion mind, that they're not in the early stages of investigating him at all.
In fact, I'd say the opposite. It seems to me like they've been investigating him a long time but at present only have circumstantial evidence, and therefore not enough to charge, so need a witness of some description to fill the missing gaps so to speak.
This was meant for someone else. Lol
Your answer wasn’t the correct answer. It was an opinion. Your answer is therefore not a matter of fact. My question is to stimulate discussion. Your answer where to tray and factually put the question to bed. Your answers/ opinions are also incorrect. In fact your ignorant in saying you had the answer. You don’t. You have an opinion.
What you forget here is that what I’m saying is that this guy is a nasty bastard. He’s obviously linked in some way And that he’s probably involved. And your basically saying but that’s bollocks because there’s no evidence. Wtf?
yes you might be right actually and I have a feeling the the leads they get will lead to a lengthy investigation.
And to accuse me of not being able to read is akin to your inability to have an open mind.