Off Topic Lunacy

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Whitejock said:
But not one shred of evidence to support your fairy stories, otherwise you'd present it here. The absence of such means I win the argument - it doesn't exist. It's fantasy stuff your Daily Mail told you to believe.
Click to expand...

Yes you do indeed win the argument because of the evidence you've supplied to support your own fairy stories.....

Oh hang on a minute, you haven't supplied any <doh> <whistle>
 
  • Like
Reactions: lifecheshirewhite
FORZA LEEDS said:
Yes you do indeed win the argument because of the evidence you've supplied to support your own fairy stories.....

Oh hang on a minute, you haven't supplied any <doh> <whistle>
Click to expand...
I have not advocated what was said at any of these meetings you refer to. You're the guys that claim to know what was said, so the onus is on you to win your argument - but you can find no evidence whatsoever to support your assertions. If you can't prove it, it never happened. It's all just supposition & hope to fuel the nonsense tory fairy stories.
 
Whitejock said:
I have not advocated what was said at any of these meetings you refer to. You're the guys that claim to know what was said, so the onus is on you to win your argument - but you can find no evidence whatsoever to support your assertions. If you can't prove it, it never happened. It's all just supposition & hope to fuel the nonsense tory fairy stories.
Click to expand...

I think what we're saying is what the ****s he meeting them for? The crimes had already been committed.

He should have been demanding they be locked up for the rest of their evil little lives, not whispering sweet nothings in their ears
 
  • Like
Reactions: MIGHTY
FORZA LEEDS said:
I will thanks very much

In the terrorist Mandela's defence he at least served his time, unlike Adams, McGuinness and all the other murdering cowardly scum

An exception was Bobby Sands who did us all a favour and starved himself to death
Click to expand...
Served his time for what? I honestly don't know his story. I just laugh at a terrorist being lauded whilst other terrorists are harangued. Appeals to my perverse sense of humour.

And why were the others you mention not imprisoned? God only knows, as they were surveilled 7x24, so all of their movements, conversations etc. were monitored & recorded. And by different governments. Are they all complicit? Why is only Corbyn being challenged? There is subterfuge here that none of us know anything about.
 
FORZA LEEDS said:
I think what we're saying is what the ****s he meeting them for? The crimes had already been committed.

He should have been demanding they be locked up for the rest of their evil little lives, not whispering sweet nothings in their ears
Click to expand...
See previous post. You saying Mo Mowlam should have been jailed for talking to them. Can you tell me if the IRA had a greater protagonist than Ian Paisley. No, of course they didn't. Yet he & McGuinness were very close friends for many, many years. Have a think about that. There's so much of the whole 'troubles' story not been told. Prolly waiting until they're all dead, otherwise it might surprise you who we demand gets jailed.
 
Now I really mist go have that nap. Had grandson #1 over for 24 hours. Knackered.

We really should meet up for a chat, LiE. Big subject, & apart from the propaganda flying about atm, you might be surprised by how much we have in common over these conspiracy theories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FORZA LEEDS
Whitejock said:
But not one shred of evidence to support your fairy stories, otherwise you'd present it here. The absence of such means I win the argument - it doesn't exist. It's fantasy stuff your Daily Mail told you to believe.
Click to expand...
You will be denying Hitler killed any jews next,with your Hamas friends.
 
For what it's worth, you can support a cause (a united Ireland) but not agree the methods some use to try to obtain it as adopted by the terrorists. I'm sure there are millions of Irish that would support the unification and would still oppose the IRA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marcos Barber and OLOF
Leedsoflondon said:
For what it's worth, you can support a cause (a united Ireland) but not agree the methods some use to try to obtain it as adopted by the terrorists. I'm sure there are millions of Irish that would support the unification and would still oppose the IRA.
Click to expand...
That's true,but would he not support sinn fein and not the IRA which is the murdering women and kids side of the group if that was the case.He's refused to condem the killings not said I support a united Ireland from what ive seen,que Wj with if he hasn't seen him pull a trigger himself he will bury his head in the sand and shout it didn't happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back