Luis Suarez - One of the Best?

I dont mind, dont really post much, normally stick to reading, so i dont honestly care.

but why exactly? for swearnig? i see alot of swearing on this forum, but dont see that many people getting warned.

maybe its for making assumptions? well that would be pathetic.

or maybe its cause i done it to a mod ( even thought he started the argument )

i dont mind much, but whatever if it makes you feel better im okay with it "chum"

 

Maxi's 3 goals were assisted by:

A Fulham defender/the post.
Johnson.
Flanagan/a defender (Flanagan played it off a defender...)

Dirk's goals was assisted by Johnson. Suarez scored the other.


He had one against B'ham, which makes 5. (I've listed four)

 

I think whichever stat site is true, it doesnt seem to equate to him being "one of the best" lolllllllllll

 

Didn't he have one in the game against Birmingham?
He definitely had one in the game against Fulham.He was man of the match in that game by some distance.

 

Captain Scarlet.

 

Arshavin and Brunt had better seasons than Adam and Silva if we judged by stats alone, that's why we have eyes, ******.

 

So let me get this right. You are basing your opinion on things that didnt happen and I am basing mine on things that did happen.

So whos deluded then?

 

So a striker who ha s never had a season in a top league, only scores 4 in 13 is that good?? how do you know?

 

"Official Premier League stats show 4 goals and 5 assists in 13 appearances (1 as a sub)"

I predict that his stats will improve this season and that he will be known as one of the best attacking players in the world.

 

You just went off on one about how B4F thinks he's better than you even though he doesn't know you, and proceeded to do exactly the same yourself, claiming your life is better than his.
If he doesn't know you, you don't know him. So to say your life is better and to make claims about who he really is, is hypocritical to say the least.
This is, as you point out, a football forum, so personal comments like those have no place here. They're as relevant as the grammar comments.

 

He has done well. You cannot deny that.

I would agree it's too early to call him one of the worlds best, but he certainly can grow into that. This season is his platform for that.

 

Your point being??

Im sorry but for a striker stats do count, there is no point in him doing much else but scoring goals and creating chances, none of which he did in any great abundance

 

Still good stats for his first season in the Prem

 

Dont get me wrong I think he has amazing talent and may go onto be your best striker in a long time, but I think you are jumping the gun a little.

 

Damn right, and he will be better this season.

 

How do you know how many chances he created? Assists are only those that went in. Nobody creates a goals with every key pass.

 

Comas.
Didn't he come out of the same league as Horseface?

 

It's me he thinks he's better than, get your facts right!

 

Course they are jumping the gun. They've got reason to be majorly optimistic for the first time in a few years.

TBF, the title of the thread has a question mark.

 

So we can't say if Iniesta is "that good" because he doesn't score much or get much assists?